The Oppo A91 and Huawei P smart Pro 2019 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they took different approaches to achieving this. This comparison focuses on the core differences in performance, driven by their respective chipsets, and the impact of charging speeds on daily usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and quicker top-ups, the Oppo A91 emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio P70, while not a flagship, offers a slight CPU performance edge, and the 20W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Huawei P smart Pro 2019’s 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 20. Released 2019, December | 2019, December. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 163.1 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V Helio P70 (12 nm) | Kirin 710F (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4025 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Lightening Black, Unicorn White, Blazing Blue, Red | Midnight Black, Breathing Crystal |
| Models | PCPM00, CPH2001, CPH2021 | - |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Oppo A91
- Faster 20W charging for quicker top-ups
- Slightly better CPU performance in some scenarios
- Helio P70’s AI processing for camera enhancements
- Potential for less refined software experience compared to Huawei
- No specific details on camera sensor quality
Huawei P smart Pro 2019
- Potentially better image processing due to Kirin chipset
- Huawei’s EMUI software (preference-based)
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds on A73 cores
- Significantly slower 10W charging
- May feel less responsive in everyday tasks
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Huawei provided display specs in the context data. However, given the price bracket, both likely feature LCD panels with 1080p+ resolution. The display experience will likely be similar, with the key differentiator being software-based color calibration and viewing angles. Without specific data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a direct camera comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards versatility. However, image processing will be a key differentiator. Huawei’s Kirin chips often excel in computational photography, potentially leading to more vibrant and detailed images in favorable lighting conditions. The A91’s Helio P70, with its AI processing capabilities, could offer improved scene recognition and optimization. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography without significant software intervention.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A91 utilizes the Mediatek Helio P70, while the Huawei P smart Pro 2019 features the Kirin 710F. Both are 12nm chips, indicating similar manufacturing processes. However, the Kirin 710F boasts slightly higher peak CPU clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz on the A73 cores), potentially offering a marginal advantage in single-core tasks. The Helio P70’s architecture, however, is optimized for AI processing, which could translate to smoother performance in camera applications. Real-world performance differences will likely be subtle, with both handling everyday tasks adequately, but the A91 may feel slightly more responsive in some scenarios.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speed is a significant differentiator. The Oppo A91’s 20W charging is double that of the Huawei P smart Pro 2019’s 10W charging. This translates to a much faster recharge time – Oppo claims 50% charge in 30 minutes. For users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost, the A91 is the clear winner. A larger battery capacity on the P smart Pro would need to be substantial to offset the charging speed disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A91 if you need a phone that feels snappier in everyday tasks and benefits from significantly faster charging. This is ideal for users who frequently use their phone for social media, browsing, and light gaming. Buy the Huawei P smart Pro 2019 if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (depending on EMUI preference) and are less concerned with maximizing performance or minimizing charging times. It's a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and basic apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P70 in the Oppo A91 struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio P70 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience in demanding games. While playable, don't expect flagship-level performance. The Kirin 710F in the P smart Pro will face similar limitations.
❓ How much slower is the 10W charging on the Huawei P smart Pro 2019 compared to the Oppo A91’s 20W charging in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo A91 can gain 50% charge in approximately 30 minutes, while the Huawei P smart Pro 2019 will take significantly longer – likely over an hour to reach the same level. This makes the A91 much more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Huawei P smart Pro 2019 benefit from any software optimizations that improve performance?
Huawei’s EMUI software includes various optimizations aimed at improving performance and battery life. However, these optimizations are unlikely to fully close the performance gap with the Oppo A91, given the underlying chipset difference.
