Infinix Note 40 Pro+ vs Oppo A80: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 100W charging capability and impressive 12:23h active use battery score outweigh the Oppo A80’s slightly newer CPU architecture. However, the A80 remains a viable option for those less concerned with charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A80 | Infinix Note 40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 14 | 2024, March 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 14 | Available. Released 2024, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 164.3 x 74.5 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP, f/2.4 2 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min 20W wireless MagCharge Reverse wired Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5100 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Obsidian Black, Vintage Green, Racing Edition |
| Models | CPH2639 | X6851B |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Oppo A80
- Slightly newer CPU architecture (Cortex-A76)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity chipset
- Significantly slower charging speed (45W)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Inferior battery life based on charging speed alone
Infinix Note 40 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 100W wired charging
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- 20W wireless MagCharge support
- Brighter display (1130 nits)
- Slightly older CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Potentially higher price point
- May lack some software features found on Oppo
Display Comparison
The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1130 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we'd expect from the Oppo A80, making the Infinix far more usable in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD or IPS panels given their price points, the higher brightness of the Infinix translates to a superior viewing experience outdoors. Details regarding the Oppo A80’s display brightness are currently unavailable, but it’s unlikely to match the Pro+’s output.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature multi-camera setups with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro lens. The Infinix Note 40 Pro+’s higher price point *suggests* a potentially larger primary sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, leading to better low-light performance and overall image quality. The Oppo A80 will likely focus on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek Dimensity chips fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ features the Dimensity 7020, while the Oppo A80 uses the Dimensity 6300. The 7020, while not a massive leap, incorporates slightly more powerful Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.2 GHz) compared to the A80’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.4 GHz). This suggests a modest performance edge for the Infinix in CPU-intensive tasks. Both chips share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (6x2.0 GHz). The real-world difference will likely be noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking, but both phones should handle everyday tasks smoothly. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X or LPDDR5 is probable for both.
Battery Life
The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ truly shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 12:23h is impressive, indicating excellent battery optimization. Crucially, it supports 100W wired charging, capable of replenishing 50% of the battery in just 12 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their phones quickly. The Oppo A80’s 45W charging, while still respectable, takes 30 minutes to reach 50%, a significant difference. The Infinix also adds 20W wireless MagCharge, reverse wired charging, and reverse wireless charging, offering unparalleled versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A80 if you need a reliable daily driver with a decent processor for everyday tasks and aren't heavily reliant on fast charging. It's ideal for users who prioritize a balanced experience over standout features. Buy the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ if you prioritize long battery life, incredibly fast charging (including wireless MagCharge), and are willing to trade off a marginally less powerful CPU for these benefits. This phone is perfect for power users and those constantly on the go.