Poco X5 Pro vs Oppo A78: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset delivers significantly better performance than the Oppo A78’s Dimensity 700, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Poco X5 Pro’s faster 67W charging is a clear advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A78 | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| IP54 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 07 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 07 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPH2483, CPH2495 | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 531398 (v9) GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A78
- Balanced overall experience
- Reliable battery endurance
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X5 Pro
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G 5G
- Faster 67W charging with multiple protocols
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A78
- Potentially more demanding on battery life due to higher performance
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A78. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the real-world difference in viewing experience will be driven by the Poco’s superior brightness. Details regarding panel technology (AMOLED vs LCD) and refresh rates are missing for the A78, but the X5 Pro’s brightness alone gives it a significant edge for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning of the Poco X5 Pro suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The A78 likely relies on a more cost-optimized setup. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It's safe to assume the Poco X5 Pro will offer more versatile camera features and potentially better image quality, given its higher overall specifications.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A78’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the A78’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during prolonged use. The A78 will handle basic tasks adequately, but the X5 Pro is the clear winner for power users.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support significantly outperforms the Oppo A78’s 33W charging. The Poco X5 Pro can reach 100% charge in just 45 minutes, while the A78 takes 67 minutes. Furthermore, the Poco X5 Pro offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A78, allowing it to top up other devices. This faster charging speed is a practical advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A78 if you prioritize a consistently smooth, everyday experience with a focus on reliable battery life and aren't heavily invested in mobile gaming or resource-intensive apps. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you value performance above all else, frequently game on your phone, or need a device capable of handling demanding multitasking and future software updates without significant slowdown.