Oppo A78 vs Oppo A98: A Head-to-Head Budget Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and generally improved performance. While the A78 offers decent value, the A98's upgrades justify its slightly higher price point for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A78 | Oppo A98 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| IP54 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 07 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 07 | Available. Released 2023, May 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue |
| Models | CPH2483, CPH2495 | CPH2529 |
| Price | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 | About 290 EUR |
Oppo A78
- More affordable
- Decent battery life
- Good for basic tasks
- Slower performance
- Slower charging
- Less versatile camera
Oppo A98
- Faster charging (67W)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Better camera system
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Slightly more expensive
- May have slightly less RAM in some configurations
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.72-inch display, likely with an FHD+ resolution. However, the A98 may have a slightly brighter panel and potentially a higher refresh rate (likely 120Hz) for smoother scrolling and animations, though this needs confirmation. The A78 likely sticks to a standard 60Hz refresh rate. Color accuracy and viewing angles should be acceptable on both.
Camera Comparison
The A98 is expected to have a more versatile camera system. While both likely feature a primary 50MP sensor, the A98 may include additional lenses (ultrawide, macro, depth) and improved image processing algorithms. Expect better low-light performance and overall image quality from the A98. Both likely have a 16MP front-facing camera.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the A98 holds a significant advantage over the Dimensity 700 in the A78. The Snapdragon offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming capabilities. The A78 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. However, the A98's 67W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0 to 50% in just 18 minutes, compared to the A78's 33W charging which takes 67 minutes for the same charge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A78? Users prioritizing a slightly lower price point and are less concerned with raw performance. Who should buy the Oppo A98? Those seeking faster charging, smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and a more future-proof chipset.