Oppo A78 vs Oppo A96: A Head-to-Head Budget Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A96 edges out the A78 thanks to its slightly more efficient chipset and faster charging. While both offer great value, the A96's Snapdragon 680 provides a smoother experience, especially for multitasking. However, the A78's Dimensity 700 offers 5G connectivity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A78 | Oppo A96 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| IP54 | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 07 | 2022, March 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 07 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple | Starry Black, Sunset Blue |
| Models | CPH2483, CPH2495 | CPH2333 |
| Price | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 | About 560 EUR |
Oppo A78
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly more affordable
- Decent display
- Good battery life
- Slightly slower performance
- Charging speed could be faster
- Camera performance slightly behind A96
Oppo A96
- Smoother performance (Snapdragon 680)
- Faster charging
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially better camera quality
- No 5G connectivity
- Slightly more expensive
- Design might be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.56-inch FHD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. The A96 might have slightly better color accuracy due to its slightly more advanced display panel, but the difference is minimal. Both offer good brightness for indoor use.
Camera Comparison
The A96 typically boasts a slightly better camera system, often featuring a 48MP main sensor compared to the A78's 50MP. While megapixels aren't everything, the A96's image processing tends to be more refined, resulting in better dynamic range and detail. Both offer decent selfie cameras.
Performance
The Oppo A96's Snapdragon 680 (6nm) generally outperforms the A78's Dimensity 700 (7nm) in everyday tasks and multitasking. The Snapdragon's Kryo 265 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness. The A78's Dimensity 700 shines with its 5G capabilities, a significant advantage for future-proofing.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life. The A96 charges slightly faster, completing a full charge in 67 minutes versus the A78's 67 minutes. The A96 also features reverse wired charging, a useful addition for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A78 is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a slightly more affordable price point. The Oppo A96 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother overall performance, slightly faster charging, and a more refined design.