The Oppo A77 and vivo Y35+ represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, but diverge in their approach to performance and charging. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing quick top-ups and sustained performance, the Oppo A77 emerges as the stronger choice. Its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime, while the Dimensity 810, despite being built on a slightly larger node, offers a marginal CPU performance advantage. However, the vivo Y35+ appeals to those valuing efficiency.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 01 | 2023, May 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 10 | Available. Released 2023, May 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 550 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
VGA |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 53% in 30 min | 15W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Violet |
| Models | CPH2339 | - |
| Price | € 149.90 / £ 159.00 | About 240 EUR |
Oppo A77
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially slightly better CPU performance with Dimensity 810
- May offer slightly improved image processing
- Likely slightly less power efficient due to 6nm process
- No reverse wired charging
vivo Y35+
- More power-efficient Dimensity 6020 (7nm)
- Convenient reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficiency
- Slower 15W charging
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor vivo provide display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Assuming both utilize standard IPS LCDs common in this price bracket, the display experience will likely be similar. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are expected to be moderate, and color accuracy will likely be adequate for everyday use but not color-critical work.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market segment, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with depth and macro lenses of limited utility. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess image quality. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 810 might offer slightly more advanced processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in the Oppo A77. The lack of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A77’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a slightly higher clocked Cortex-A76 core (2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz in the vivo Y35+'s Dimensity 6020, 7nm). While the 7nm process of the Dimensity 6020 is generally more efficient, the higher clock speed and potentially more aggressive core configuration of the Dimensity 810 could translate to a small performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. Both chips share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, suggesting similar multi-core performance in sustained workloads. The 6nm node of the A77 may result in slightly higher thermal output under prolonged stress, but the difference is unlikely to be substantial. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is the likely standard for both.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the charging speed is a key differentiator. The Oppo A77’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the vivo Y35+'s 15W charging. Oppo claims a 53% charge in 30 minutes, implying a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes. The vivo Y35+ will likely take over two hours for a full charge. The inclusion of reverse wired charging on the vivo Y35+ is a unique feature, allowing it to function as a power bank for other devices, a benefit the Oppo A77 lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A77 if you need faster charging speeds and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming or multitasking. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery. Buy the vivo Y35+ if you prioritize power efficiency and reverse wired charging, making it a useful power bank for accessories, and are less concerned with peak performance or rapid charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A77 get noticeably warmer than the vivo Y35+ during extended gaming sessions?
The Oppo A77's Dimensity 810, built on a 6nm process, may generate slightly more heat than the vivo Y35+'s Dimensity 6020 (7nm) during prolonged gaming. However, both phones are likely to employ thermal throttling to manage temperatures, limiting sustained peak performance. The difference in heat output is unlikely to be dramatic.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the vivo Y35+ fast enough to meaningfully charge other devices like earbuds or a smartwatch?
The 15W reverse wired charging on the vivo Y35+ is sufficient to slowly charge accessories like earbuds, smartwatches, or even another phone in an emergency. It won't be as fast as using a dedicated charger, but it provides a convenient option for topping up smaller devices on the go.
❓ Can I expect a smooth experience with popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile on either of these phones?
Both the Dimensity 810 and 6020 are capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to use medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. Expect some frame drops during intense action sequences. The Oppo A77 might maintain slightly higher frame rates due to its marginally more powerful processor.
