Oppo A77 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite emerges as the better choice. Its 67W SuperVOOC charging significantly reduces downtime, reaching 80% in just 30 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Oppo A77’s 33W charging. While the Dimensity 810 offers slightly higher CPU clock speeds, the Snapdragon 695 provides a more balanced and efficient experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A77 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 01 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 10 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IPX4 water resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 53% in 30 min | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | CPH2339 | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | € 149.90 / £ 159.00 | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A77
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance for basic tasks.
- Competitive price point.
- 5G connectivity.
- Slower 33W charging.
- MediaTek chipset may exhibit more thermal throttling.
- Likely less refined software experience.
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Significantly faster 67W charging.
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 offers better efficiency.
- Typically smoother software experience from OnePlus.
- Potentially better image processing.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds.
- May be marginally more expensive.
- Similar display quality to the Oppo A77.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a prioritization of battery life over visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of phones in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors (the usefulness of the latter is questionable). The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance on the Nord CE 3 Lite. Sensor size and aperture are critical factors, but absent that data, we can infer a slight advantage to the OnePlus due to Qualcomm’s image processing prowess.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A77’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a dual-cluster CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) employs 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Dimensity 810 has a slight clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture and ISP. This translates to potentially better image processing and more consistent performance under sustained loads. The Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficiency, potentially leading to better battery life. RAM configurations are likely similar, impacting multitasking capabilities on both devices.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. Achieving 80% charge in 30 minutes is significantly faster than the Oppo A77’s 33W charging, which reaches 53% in the same timeframe. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Nord CE 3 Lite mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. This is a crucial advantage for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A77 if you prioritize raw CPU performance for basic multitasking and light gaming, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a good option for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and social media. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value fast charging, a more refined software experience (typical of OnePlus), and a generally smoother, more efficient performance profile for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.