The Oppo A77 and Honor X8c represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a modern experience without breaking the bank. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, relying on distinct chipsets and slightly varied feature sets. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and slightly faster charging, the Honor X8c emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 685, while clocked lower, utilizes more efficient Cortex-A73 cores, offering a smoother experience in everyday tasks and sustained performance. The 35W charging is a minor but welcome advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 01 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 10 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 53% in 30 min | 35W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | CPH2339 | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | € 149.90 / £ 159.00 | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
Oppo A77
- Potentially higher peak performance for gaming
- Faster CPU clock speeds (A76 cores)
- Competitive 33W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Dimensity 810 may be less efficient than Snapdragon 685
- Limited information on display quality
Honor X8c
- More efficient chipset for sustained performance
- Slightly faster 35W charging
- Snapdragon 685 offers a balanced experience
- Lower peak CPU clock speeds
- Older Cortex-A73 core architecture
- Limited information on display quality
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Honor provide display specs beyond resolution. Assuming both utilize standard IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, the display experience will likely be similar. Color accuracy and peak brightness will be key differentiators, but without test data, it's difficult to assess. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors. The image processing algorithms will significantly impact the final image quality. Given the price point, expect similar limitations in low-light performance. The Snapdragon 685’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally considered competent, but without knowing sensor sizes and apertures, it’s impossible to declare a clear winner. We can assume both phones will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A77’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup clocked at 2.4GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0GHz. This configuration prioritizes peak performance. Conversely, the Honor X8c’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm) employs a quad-core Cortex-A73 cluster at 2.8GHz alongside four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.9GHz. While the A73 cores are older architecture, their higher clock speed and generally more efficient design provide a noticeable advantage in sustained workloads. The Dimensity 810 may show higher scores in benchmark bursts, but the Snapdragon 685 is likely to maintain performance longer under load, reducing throttling. The A77's potential for higher peak performance is geared towards gaming, while the X8c offers a more consistent experience.
Battery Life
The Oppo A77 supports 33W wired charging, achieving 53% charge in 30 minutes. The Honor X8c boasts 35W wired charging. While the difference is marginal, the X8c’s slightly faster charging is a benefit. Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but given the market segment, we can estimate both fall in the 5000mAh range. The Snapdragon 685’s efficiency may translate to slightly better battery life in real-world usage, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A77 if you frequently engage in graphically intensive tasks like mobile gaming and need the theoretical peak performance offered by the Dimensity 810. However, be prepared for potential thermal throttling. Buy the Honor X8c if you prioritize a balanced experience with reliable performance for everyday use, efficient power management, and a slightly faster charging solution. It’s the more practical choice for most users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 810 in the Oppo A77 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 810 is capable of delivering high performance, but its thermal management in the Oppo A77 is a concern. Given the phone's plastic build and budget cooling solutions, expect some throttling after 20-30 minutes of demanding games. The Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c is more likely to maintain consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c powerful enough for multitasking and everyday apps?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 685, with its Cortex-A73 cores, is well-suited for handling everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and running multiple apps simultaneously. While it won't match the peak performance of the Dimensity 810, it provides a smoother and more reliable experience for typical smartphone usage.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 33W and 35W?
The difference is relatively small, but the Honor X8c's 35W charging will likely shave off a few minutes from a full charge compared to the Oppo A77's 33W. The Oppo A77 reaches 53% in 30 minutes, so the X8c will likely be slightly above that percentage in the same timeframe.
