Both the Oppo A77 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they take distinctly different approaches to achieving affordability. The Oppo A77 4G focuses on a streamlined experience with a relatively basic chipset, while the Redmi Note 11R aims for a performance boost with a more modern processor. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Oppo A77 4G’s Helio G35, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. While the Oppo A77 4G charges faster, the performance gap is too significant to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 03 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 03 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic or leather back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g / 189 g (6.60 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunset Orange, Sky Blue | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | CPH2385 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Oppo A77 4G
- Faster 33W charging
- Simple and streamlined user experience
- Potentially slightly longer battery life due to less demanding processor
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Less future-proof
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- Much faster and more efficient Dimensity 700 processor
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- More future-proof
- Improved image processing capabilities
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is clearly not on visual fidelity. Bezels are likely comparable, and both will offer a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The display difference is minimal and won't be a deciding factor for most buyers.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses (likely depth and macro). The Redmi Note 11R’s image processing, powered by the more capable Dimensity 700, will likely offer better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Oppo A77 4G’s camera will likely be sufficient for casual snapshots, but won’t match the Redmi Note 11R in challenging lighting conditions. We can expect both to include a 2MP macro camera, which offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo A77 4G’s Mediatek Helio G35 (12nm). The Dimensity 700 features more powerful Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.2 GHz) compared to the A53 cores (4x2.3 GHz) in the Helio G35. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the Redmi Note 11R’s slightly lower battery capacity. The Helio G35 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Oppo A77 4G’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage, achieving a full charge in just 69 minutes. The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging is considerably slower. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency may mitigate the difference in real-world usage. While the Oppo A77 4G will charge faster, the Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient processor could result in comparable battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity (specific mAh not provided).
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A77 4G if you prioritize fast charging and a simple, no-frills user experience, and your smartphone usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and running more demanding apps, and are willing to trade a bit of charging speed for a more capable processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 chipset is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship gaming experience, it’s a significant improvement over the Helio G35 in the Oppo A77 4G, which would likely struggle with consistent performance.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 33W charging on the Oppo A77 4G is considerably faster than the 18W charging on the Redmi Note 11R. You’ll notice a significant difference in how quickly you can top up the battery, especially if you frequently run low on power. However, the Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient processor may partially offset this difference in overall battery life.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses social media and messaging apps?
Both phones are perfectly capable of handling social media and messaging apps. However, the Redmi Note 11R’s faster processor will provide a smoother and more responsive experience, even when multitasking between apps. The Oppo A77 4G will function adequately, but may exhibit occasional lag.
