The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo A77 4G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, but they take distinctly different approaches. The A77 focuses on a streamlined experience, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G pushes for 5G connectivity and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers significantly better performance and future-proofing than the Oppo A77 4G’s Helio G35. The 67W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 41 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Oppo’s 69-minute charge time.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 03 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 03 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic or leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g / 189 g (6.60 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunset Orange, Sky Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPH2385 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A77 4G
- Simpler user experience
- Potentially more affordable (depending on region)
- Decent battery endurance
- Outdated Helio G35 chipset
- Slow 33W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software experience can be cluttered (MIUI)
- Display specs are not exceptional
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting standard IPS LCD panels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s positioning, it likely benefits from a slightly more refined display calibration. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is typical for this price bracket, but impacts smoothness during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G, being a more feature-rich device, likely incorporates a more capable primary sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a dedicated night mode or other software enhancements is more probable on the Poco. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Oppo A77 4G’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling under sustained loads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 695 utilizes a more modern architecture (Kryo 660 Gold & Silver) compared to the Cortex-A53 cores in the Helio G35, resulting in noticeable performance gains in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 695 also unlocks 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Oppo A77 4G.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a significant advantage, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Oppo A77 4G’s 33W charging takes a comparatively slow 69 minutes for a full charge. This faster charging capability makes the Poco X4 Pro 5G much more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A77 4G if you prioritize simplicity and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and 5G isn't a necessity. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want a more capable device for gaming, streaming, and future-proofing with 5G connectivity, and value significantly faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 695 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The Helio G35 in the Oppo A77 4G will struggle with PUBG Mobile, even on the lowest settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the Oppo A77 4G in a typical use case?
In a typical scenario, the Poco X4 Pro 5G can gain a substantial charge during a short break. While the Oppo A77 4G might only gain 20-30% in 30 minutes, the Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach around 50-60% in the same timeframe, making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Poco X4 Pro 5G will fall back to 4G LTE. The 5G modem provides future-proofing, ensuring the phone remains compatible with evolving network infrastructure. It also offers potentially faster download speeds when 5G is available.
