The Oppo A73 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite represent a sweet spot in the smartphone market, offering a balance of features and affordability. While both aim for the budget-conscious consumer, they diverge in their core processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo A73’s Snapdragon 662, making it better suited for multitasking and gaming. While the A73 boasts faster 30W charging, the 720G’s efficiency mitigates the Redmi Note 10 Lite’s slower 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 05. Released 2020, November 20 | 2021, October 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, October 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 72.9 x 7.5 mm (6.29 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) | 165.8 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, MIUI 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 (single lane) | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4015 mAh | Li-Po 5020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Navy Blue, Classic Silver | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Black, Champagne Gold |
| Models | CPH2099 | M2002F4LG |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A73
- Faster 30W charging
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Less powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Less efficient 11nm process
- Potentially lower performance in demanding tasks
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite
- More powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- More efficient 8nm process
- Smoother performance for gaming and multitasking
- Slower 18W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potential for more software bloat (Xiaomi's MIUI)
Display Comparison
Neither device is a display standout. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing. The focus here is on internal performance, not display fidelity. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be typical for budget LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup geared towards general photography. The Redmi Note 10 Lite likely benefits from the more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 720G, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be a significant advantage, but is unknown for either device. Focusing on the main sensor resolution is misleading without knowing sensor size and pixel binning capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo A73’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 8nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. The 720G’s CPU configuration – 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver – also provides a clock speed advantage over the A73’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Redmi Note 10 Lite. While both utilize an octa-core configuration, the architectural improvements in the 720G are substantial.
Battery Life
The Oppo A73’s 30W charging is its standout feature, capable of reaching 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. The Redmi Note 10 Lite’s 18W charging is considerably slower. However, the Snapdragon 720G’s 8nm efficiency means the Redmi Note 10 Lite will likely consume less power during typical usage, potentially offsetting the charging speed disadvantage. Actual battery life will depend on usage patterns, but the 720G’s efficiency gives it an edge in longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A73 if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are a light user who primarily focuses on basic tasks like calls, messaging, and social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Lite if you value smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate a more efficient chipset that balances power and battery life. The Redmi Note 10 Lite is the better choice for users who demand more from their smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Lite struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it's a significant improvement over the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo A73, offering a smoother and more consistent experience.
❓ How much of a difference will the 8nm process make in real-world battery life on the Redmi Note 10 Lite?
The 8nm process on the Snapdragon 720G is more power-efficient than the 11nm process on the Snapdragon 662. This translates to less heat generation and lower power consumption during everyday tasks. You can expect a noticeable improvement in battery life on the Redmi Note 10 Lite, potentially adding several hours of usage compared to the Oppo A73.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo A73 a game-changer, or is it just a marketing gimmick?
30W charging is genuinely fast and convenient. The Oppo A73 can reach a 50% charge in just 30 minutes, which is a significant time saver. However, the Redmi Note 10 Lite’s more efficient chipset means you may not *need* to charge as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed.
