Oppo A73 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with the blazing-fast 67W charging, provides a more refined and convenient user experience. While the Oppo A73 5G offers a respectable package, it falls behind in charging speed and overall performance efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A73 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 4. Released 2020, November 4 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Navy Black, Neon | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | CPH2161 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A73 5G
- Potentially slightly better power efficiency with the Dimensity 720.
- May be available at a lower price point.
- Reliable MediaTek chipset.
- Significantly slower 18W charging.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Snapdragon 695.
- Likely dimmer display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3.
- Brighter 746 nit display for better outdoor visibility.
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset (6nm).
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Snapdragon 695 can still exhibit throttling under heavy load.
- Software experience can vary with Xiaomi's MIUI.
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the Oppo A73 5G’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical IPS panel, but the higher brightness is the key differentiator. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy is assumed to be standard for both.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand positioning suggests a greater emphasis on camera quality, potentially featuring a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, a common feature in this price range, would further enhance its photographic capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The 2MP macro cameras found on many phones in this class are unlikely to be a significant selling point for either device.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), built on a more efficient manufacturing process than the Oppo A73 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a slight clock speed advantage over the Dimensity 720’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.0 GHz). More importantly, the 6nm process node translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits gamers and users who frequently multitask. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to offer a smoother experience with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging experience is where the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G truly shines. Its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can replenish the battery to 50% in just 15 minutes and fully charge it in 42 minutes. The Oppo A73 5G’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to reach a full charge. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts usability, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A73 5G if you prioritize a slightly more power-efficient chipset for basic daily tasks and are less concerned with rapid charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value faster charging, a brighter display, and a more modern chipset architecture for smoother multitasking and potentially better long-term software support.