Oppo A73 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging, capable of a full charge in 41 minutes, significantly outperforms the Oppo A73 5G’s 18W charging. While both offer similar battery endurance ratings, the Poco’s charging speed provides a crucial convenience advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A73 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 4. Released 2020, November 4 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Navy Black, Neon | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPH2161 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A73 5G
- Potentially cleaner software experience (depending on ColorOS version)
- Slightly more compact design (likely, based on Oppo's design language)
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 720 chipset
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Less efficient 7nm chipset compared to the Poco's 6nm
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 (6nm) chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- MIUI software can be feature-rich but also bloated
- Larger size and weight (likely, based on Xiaomi's design language)
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). The absence of these details suggests both likely employ standard camera setups for this price range. It's reasonable to assume the Poco X4 Pro 5G, given Xiaomi’s camera focus, might offer slightly more refined image processing, but without concrete sensor information, it’s difficult to definitively say.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Oppo A73 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The 6nm process generally translates to improved thermal efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also offer a slight clock speed advantage over the Dimensity 720’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This means the Poco X4 Pro 5G is likely to handle demanding tasks and gaming slightly more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A73 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. In contrast, the Oppo A73 5G’s 18W charging is significantly slower, making the Poco a far more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A73 5G if you prioritize a simple, clean software experience and are less concerned with extremely fast charging. It’s a solid option for users who primarily need basic smartphone functionality with 5G. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, potentially better sustained performance due to the 6nm process, and don't mind a more feature-rich (and potentially more cluttered) MIUI software experience.