Oppo A73 5G vs OnePlus Nord CE 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset, coupled with 30W fast charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage over the Oppo A73 5G's Dimensity 720 and 18W charging. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Nord CE 5G’s faster replenishment is a key differentiator.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A73 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 4. Released 2020, November 4 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Navy Black, Neon | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | CPH2161 | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.9 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9) GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A73 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 720 chipset for everyday tasks
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 750G
- Limited display specifications
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 750G processor
- Significantly faster 30W charging (70% in 30 min)
- Brighter display (607 nits)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to A73 5G despite faster charging
- Camera performance may not be significantly better
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 607 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A73 5G. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays are likely to have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED panels), the Nord CE 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for users who frequently consume content in bright environments. The A73 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially less vibrant or color-accurate experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, OnePlus generally prioritizes image processing for natural-looking photos, while Oppo often leans towards more vibrant, saturated colors. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer, focusing instead on providing a versatile, all-around imaging experience. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lenses on either device is questionable, offering limited image quality improvements.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord CE 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) features Kryo 570 cores clocked up to 2.2 GHz, offering a performance edge over the Oppo A73 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm) with its Cortex-A76 cores peaking at 2.0 GHz. The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 750G generally provides better power efficiency than the 7nm Dimensity 720, potentially leading to improved sustained performance under load. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon’s architecture and higher clock speeds will result in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A73 5G and the OnePlus Nord CE 5G achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Nord CE 5G’s 30W wired charging capability significantly outperforms the A73 5G’s 18W charging. The Nord CE 5G can reach 70% charge in just 30 minutes, while the A73 5G will take considerably longer to achieve a full charge. This faster charging is a crucial advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A73 5G if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slightly slower performance and charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for everyday tasks and light media consumption. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you value faster processing for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate the convenience of significantly quicker 30W charging, making it ideal for power users and those on the go.