Oppo A73 5G vs Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) offers a more compelling package. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge and better thermal management. While the Oppo A73 5G is a capable device, the Motorola’s Quick Charge support and slightly more refined software experience give it the win.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A73 5G | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 5, 12, 14, 24, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 4. Released 2020, November 4 | 2022, April 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, April 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 168.9 x 75.8 x 9.3 mm (6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | Stylus Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired, QC3 |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Navy Black, Neon | Steel Blue, Seafoam Green |
| Models | CPH2161 | XT2215, XT2215-1, XT2215-2, XT2215-3, XT2215-4 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 66.60 |
Oppo A73 5G
- Faster wired charging (18W)
- Clean and minimalist software experience
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less efficient chipset (7nm vs 6nm)
- Potentially lower sustained performance
- Slower CPU clock speeds
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)
- More efficient chipset (6nm Snapdragon 695)
- Quick Charge 3.0 support (with compatible charger)
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and creativity
- Slower wired charging (10W)
- Potentially higher price point
- Motorola's software can include bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. While specific display specs are unavailable, the Motorola benefits from a more modern chipset that *could* translate to slightly better image processing. Bezels are expected to be comparable, and color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment – adequate, but not color-critical. The lack of high refresh rates on either device is typical for this price point.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones relying on budget-friendly sensors. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 695 generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Oppo A73 5G may lean towards more saturated colors, a common trait of MediaTek-powered devices, while the Motorola might aim for a more natural look. The presence of a stylus on the Motorola could be useful for photo editing, but the overall image quality will be limited by the sensor and lens quality.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Oppo A73 5G uses the MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 is a significant advantage, offering improved power efficiency and thermal performance. This means the Motorola is less likely to throttle under sustained load, making it better suited for gaming or prolonged multitasking. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also offer a slight clock speed advantage over the Dimensity 720’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.0 GHz). While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Snapdragon 695 translate to a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While specific battery capacities are not provided, the Snapdragon 695’s superior power efficiency gives the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) an edge. The Oppo A73 5G’s 18W charging is faster than the Motorola’s 10W charging with Quick Charge 3.0 support. This means the Oppo will reach 100% charge more quickly, but the Motorola’s more efficient chipset will likely result in longer overall usage time between charges. The inclusion of Quick Charge 3.0 on the Motorola allows for faster charging with a compatible charger, mitigating the lower wattage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A73 5G if you prioritize a clean, minimalist software experience and are less demanding in terms of sustained performance. It’s a solid choice for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light video streaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) if you value performance for gaming or multitasking, appreciate the convenience of a stylus, and want faster charging capabilities. It’s the better option for power users on a budget.