Google Pixel 6a vs Oppo A73 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chipset offers significantly better performance and future-proofing, coupled with Google’s exceptional camera software. While the Oppo A73 5G provides 5G connectivity at a lower price, the performance gap is substantial.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A73 5G | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 4. Released 2020, November 4 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4040 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Navy Black, Neon | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | CPH2161 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Oppo A73 5G
- Superior performance with Google Tensor chipset
- Excellent camera quality and software features
- Long-term software support from Google
- Higher price point than Oppo A73 5G
- Charging speed is standard at 18W
Google Pixel 6a
- More affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life
- Significantly weaker performance
- Less capable camera system
- Limited software update support
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 876 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A73 5G. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays offer an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the Pixel 6a’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration likely result in a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The Oppo A73 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more basic panel.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the Pixel 6a’s strength lies in Google’s computational photography. The Pixel 6a benefits from Google’s image processing algorithms, delivering consistently excellent photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Oppo A73 5G’s camera performance is likely more dependent on the hardware itself, and without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The Pixel 6a’s software features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone further enhance its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A73 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The Tensor’s CPU configuration – 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a significant performance advantage over the Dimensity 720’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Pixel 6a will handle demanding tasks like video editing and gaming with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A73 5G and Google Pixel 6a achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Pixel 6a supports PD3.0 charging alongside 18W wired charging, potentially offering faster and more efficient charging compared to the Oppo A73 5G’s standard 18W wired charging. The Tensor chip’s improved power efficiency also contributes to the Pixel 6a’s strong battery performance despite its demanding processing capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A73 5G if you prioritize affordability and basic 5G connectivity above all else, and are willing to compromise on processing power and camera quality. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a smooth user experience, excellent camera capabilities, and long-term software support, even if it means spending a bit more.