OnePlus Nord 5 vs Oppo A72: A Comprehensive Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and future-proofing, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 delivers significantly superior performance and boasts incredibly fast 80W charging. However, the Oppo A72 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize affordability over raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A72 | OnePlus Nord 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 21. Released 2020, April 29 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens 2 MP B/W, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min 5W reverse wired Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Twilight Black, Stream White, Sky Blue, Aurora Purple | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | CPH2067 | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.48 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo A72
- Significantly more affordable
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Reliable for everyday tasks
- Outdated Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
OnePlus Nord 5
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1330 nits)
- Higher price point
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1330 nits, compared to the Oppo A72’s unspecified brightness. This difference translates to vastly improved visibility in direct sunlight. While the A72’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s superior brightness suggests a more advanced panel, potentially with higher contrast and color accuracy. The lack of detailed display specs for the A72 indicates a focus on cost reduction in this area.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A72, a direct comparison is limited. However, given its market positioning, it’s likely to feature a more basic camera system. The OnePlus Nord 5, while details are missing, benefits from the processing power of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, enabling more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) will contribute to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The absence of OIS or large sensor details for the A72 suggests a focus on affordability over photographic excellence.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A72 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), while the OnePlus Nord 5 features the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm). This is a generational leap. The 8s Gen 3’s 4nm process offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. The Nord 5’s CPU, with its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, will demonstrably outperform the A72’s Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.0 GHz in CPU-intensive tasks. The 8s Gen 3 also features a more powerful GPU, making the Nord 5 the clear choice for gaming.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5’s battery endurance is rated at 49:12 hours, with an active use score of 13:47 hours, showcasing excellent battery life. Crucially, its 80W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 54 minutes, a massive advantage over the Oppo A72’s 18W charging. While the A72’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s faster charging and efficient chipset mitigate the impact of any potential capacity difference. The Nord 5 also offers 33W PPS, 18W PD, and 5W reverse wired charging, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A72 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand high-end gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you prioritize a smooth, responsive experience, demanding mobile gaming, and rapid charging – and are willing to pay a premium for those features. It’s the better choice for power users and those who want a phone that will remain capable for years to come.