Oppo A60 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and faster charging, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 67W SuperVOOC charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Oppo A60 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget where 5G isn't essential.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A60 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 26 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 950 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/3.94", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Purple, Ripple Blue | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | CPH2631 | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | £ 129.95 | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A60
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset for basic tasks
- Large 5000mAh battery for all-day use
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Slower charging speeds (45W)
- Less powerful processor for demanding apps
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Significantly faster 67W SuperVOOC charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 processor for smoother performance
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A60
- May experience slightly more heat under sustained load
- Similar battery capacity to the A60
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor OnePlus provide display specs beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points. The real difference lies in the processing power driving the display. The Snapdragon 695 in the Nord CE 3 Lite will likely deliver smoother animations and faster response times, especially when scrolling through content. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this segment. Color accuracy will likely be standard for budget devices, leaning towards vibrant but not necessarily color-accurate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera sensor paired with depth and macro lenses. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite, benefiting from its more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon 695, will likely exhibit superior image processing, resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction, particularly in low-light conditions. The A60’s image processing will be adequate, but will likely fall behind in challenging lighting scenarios. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core distinction here is the chipset. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a clear upgrade over the Oppo A60’s Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm). The 695 features a more modern CPU architecture (Kryo 660 vs Kryo 265) with a 2x2.2 GHz prime core configuration compared to the A60’s 4x2.4 GHz setup. While the A60 has more small cores, the 695’s architectural improvements and 5G modem integration provide a more responsive and future-proof experience. This translates to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and the ability to leverage 5G networks. The A60 will be adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices feature a 5000mAh battery, suggesting comparable endurance under similar usage conditions. However, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. It can reach 80% charge in just 30 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Oppo A60’s 45W charging, while respectable, takes longer to achieve a similar charge level. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts the user experience, making the Nord CE 3 Lite more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A60 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and 5G connectivity isn't a priority. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you prefer a smoother multitasking experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of 5G, coupled with significantly quicker charging speeds – even if it means spending a bit more.