The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A60 and Infinix Note 40 Pro are two contenders vying for your attention. The A60 leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 680, a known quantity for efficiency, while the Note 40 Pro introduces MediaTek's Dimensity 7020, promising a step up in processing power. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of efficiency and affordability, the Infinix Note 40 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7020 chipset delivers noticeably better performance than the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A60, and the addition of 20W MagCharge wireless charging adds significant convenience, justifying the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 26 | 2024, March 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 26 | Available. Released 2024, March 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 164.3 x 74.5 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g or 196 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, XOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP, f/2.4
2 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/3.94", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 45W wired, 50% in 26 min
20W wireless MagCharge
Reverse wired
Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Purple, Ripple Blue | Vintage Green, Titan Gold, Racing Edition |
| Models | CPH2631 | X6851 |
| Price | £ 129.95 | About 280 EUR |
Oppo A60
- Excellent power efficiency with the Snapdragon 680.
- Reliable performance for basic tasks.
- Potentially lower price point.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Dimensity 7020.
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities.
- Slower charging speed than the Note 40 Pro.
Infinix Note 40 Pro
- Superior performance with the Dimensity 7020 chipset.
- 20W MagCharge wireless charging for added convenience.
- Faster 45W wired charging.
- Potentially higher price.
- Dimensity 7020 may consume more power than Snapdragon 680 during intensive tasks.
- XOS software can be bloated with pre-installed apps.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are absent, both utilize 6nm chipsets which indirectly suggest a focus on efficiency rather than pushing display boundaries. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points. The real difference lies in software optimization; Oppo's ColorOS is generally known for its vibrant, if sometimes oversaturated, color profiles, while Infinix's XOS aims for a more natural look. Without direct testing, it's difficult to declare a clear winner, but users prioritizing color accuracy might lean towards the Infinix.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Infinix Note 40 Pro likely features a more capable primary sensor. The Dimensity 7020’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced than the Snapdragon 680’s, enabling better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. Expect the Note 40 Pro to offer more detailed photos and improved dynamic range. The Oppo A60 will likely suffice for casual snapshots, but enthusiasts will find the Note 40 Pro more rewarding.
Performance
The core difference here is the chipset. The Infinix Note 40 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 7020, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Oppo A60’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. The Cortex-A78 cores are substantially more powerful than the Kryo 265 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 680, translating to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. While both are built on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 7020’s more modern CPU architecture provides a clear performance edge. The Snapdragon 680 excels in power efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life during less demanding tasks. However, for gaming or resource-intensive applications, the Note 40 Pro will deliver a superior experience.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 45W wired charging, with the Infinix Note 40 Pro achieving 50% charge in 26 minutes compared to the Oppo A60’s 30 minutes. This faster charging speed is a tangible benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. Crucially, the Note 40 Pro adds 20W MagCharge wireless charging and reverse wired/wireless charging, features entirely absent on the A60. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the inclusion of wireless charging suggests Infinix prioritized convenience and a more versatile charging ecosystem.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A60 if you need a reliable, long-lasting device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and prioritize battery life over raw performance. Buy the Infinix Note 40 Pro if you prefer a smoother experience for multitasking, gaming, and content creation, and value the convenience of wireless charging and faster wired charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7020 in the Infinix Note 40 Pro get noticeably warm during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7020 is a capable chip, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. However, the 6nm process and Infinix’s thermal management system should prevent significant throttling. Expect some warmth, but not to the point of severely impacting performance. The Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A60 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of lower frame rates.
❓ Is the 45W charging on both phones compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While both support 45W charging, compatibility with Power Delivery (PD) chargers isn't guaranteed. It's best to use the charger included in the box or a charger specifically certified for the respective phone's charging protocol to ensure optimal charging speeds and prevent potential compatibility issues. The Infinix Note 40 Pro's MagCharge is proprietary and requires compatible accessories.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Oppo's ColorOS and Infinix's XOS?
Oppo's ColorOS is generally considered more polished and refined, with a focus on customization and visual flair. Infinix's XOS, while improving, often includes more pre-installed apps (bloatware) and can feel less optimized. Both offer similar core features, but ColorOS typically receives faster software updates and security patches.
