Xiaomi 14 Pro vs Oppo A6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and the fastest charging speeds, the Xiaomi 14 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Oppo A6 Pro provides a compelling alternative for budget-conscious buyers who value a balanced feature set and respectable performance for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A6 Pro | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1,2 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 23 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD Reverse wired charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh - version 1· 6500 mAh - version 2 | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar Titanium, Stellar Blue, Coral Pink, Rosewood Red | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | CPH2781 | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 650 EUR |
Oppo A6 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Likely a less advanced camera system
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Industry-leading 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Advanced camera system with superior image processing
- Significantly higher price
- Potentially more prone to thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the Oppo A6 Pro, Xiaomi 14 Pro likely features an LTPO AMOLED panel, enabling adaptive refresh rates for improved power efficiency. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s display benefits from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s advanced display engine, optimizing color accuracy and brightness. The 14 Pro’s 120W charging is complemented by a display designed for quick wake-and-unlock, a feature often tied to high refresh rate panels. The Oppo A6 Pro, targeting a lower price bracket, likely utilizes a standard AMOLED panel, potentially with a fixed refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Oppo A6 Pro, it’s reasonable to assume a more modest camera system focused on everyday photography. The Xiaomi 14 Pro, being a flagship, likely features a larger sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is a key advantage, enabling faster image processing, improved low-light performance, and advanced features like 8K video recording. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) will be more effective due to the processor’s superior image stabilization algorithms. While the Oppo A6 Pro may offer a decent camera for casual use, the Xiaomi 14 Pro is geared towards photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 14 Pro boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), a significantly more powerful processor than the Oppo A6 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, provides a substantial performance leap over the A6 Pro’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 translates to superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, offering faster data transfer speeds compared to the likely LPDDR4x or LPDDR5 RAM in the Oppo A6 Pro. This difference will be most noticeable in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 18 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo A6 Pro’s 80W charging. The Xiaomi 14 Pro also adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Oppo A6 Pro. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Xiaomi 14 Pro’s more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and optimized power management will likely result in comparable or better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Oppo A6 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and fast 80W charging, and prioritize value for money over top-tier performance. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you demand the absolute best in processing power for gaming and demanding applications, require the fastest 120W wired and 50W wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a flagship experience.