Oppo A6 Pro vs. vivo X100 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range and Flagship Android Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value, the Oppo A6 Pro offers a respectable experience. However, the vivo X100 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful Dimensity 9300 chipset, a brighter display reaching 1472 nits, and superior camera technology, justifying its higher price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A6 Pro | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1,2 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 23 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star D+ | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD Reverse wired charging | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh - version 1· 6500 mAh - version 2 | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lunar Titanium, Stellar Blue, Coral Pink, Rosewood Red | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | CPH2781 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A6 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Respectable 80W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
vivo X100 Pro
- Flagship Dimensity 9300 performance
- 1472 nits peak display brightness
- Faster 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Superior camera system (implied)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger size and weight
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro’s display immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1472 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo A6 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be significantly dimmer. The X100 Pro’s panel likely incorporates LTPO technology, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency, a feature likely absent in the A6 Pro. This difference in display tech will be noticeable for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro is positioned as a camera-centric device, though specific sensor details are missing. However, its flagship status suggests a larger, more capable main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The Oppo A6 Pro, being a mid-range device, will likely feature a more modest camera setup. While both phones offer reverse wired charging, the X100 Pro’s image quality and video capabilities will likely surpass the A6 Pro significantly, making it the preferred choice for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A6 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), while the vivo X100 Pro is powered by the flagship Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4nm). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9300 provides superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 6nm Dimensity 6300. The X100 Pro’s CPU configuration – featuring Cortex-X4 cores – offers a substantial performance uplift over the A6 Pro’s Cortex-A76 and A55 cores, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The X100 Pro will deliver a smoother, more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a 100W wired charging capability, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 14 minutes, and also supports 50W wireless charging. The Oppo A6 Pro offers 80W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD, and reverse wired charging. While the A6 Pro’s charging is respectable, the X100 Pro’s faster wired and wireless charging provide greater convenience. The X100 Pro’s active use score of 13:53h suggests excellent battery optimization, potentially offsetting any capacity differences with the A6 Pro (whose capacity is unknown).
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability. Its 80W charging is a strong point in this segment. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, require a class-leading camera system, and value a brighter, more vibrant display, and faster charging speeds.