The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro and Oppo A6 Pro represent compelling options within the competitive Chinese smartphone market. The Ace 3 Pro arrives as a performance-focused device powered by Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the A6 Pro aims to deliver a balanced experience with MediaTek’s Dimensity 7300, prioritizing value and efficient charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and demanding gaming, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. However, the Oppo A6 Pro offers a strong value proposition with its efficient Dimensity 7300 and rapid 80W charging, making it ideal for everyday users and those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 09 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 12 | Available. Released 2024, July 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 75 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.7 / 8.9 / 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 207 g, 212 g, 225 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels (~397 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 105.0 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, UFCS
10W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD2.0, QC2, 52% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 6100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Gray, White, Green |
| Models | PLN110 | PJX110 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 410 EUR |
Oppo A6 Pro (China)
- Faster 80W charging with multiple standards support
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset for everyday tasks
- Significantly lower performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Likely less advanced camera system
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
OnePlus Ace 3 Pro
- Top-tier performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Faster 100W charging
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Higher price tag
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May run hotter under heavy load
Display Comparison
While display specifications are not provided, both devices likely feature AMOLED panels given their market segment. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and refresh rate. The Ace 3 Pro, being a flagship-leaning device, is expected to have a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The A6 Pro, focusing on value, may compromise slightly on peak brightness but could still offer a smooth experience with a 120Hz refresh rate. Bezels are likely to be minimal on both, but the Ace 3 Pro may have a slight edge in panel quality and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Ace 3 Pro, positioned as a higher-end device, is likely to feature a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS). The Oppo A6 Pro may rely on software processing to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor. Lens apertures will also play a role; wider apertures (lower f-number) allow for better low-light performance. The Ace 3 Pro is expected to offer more versatile camera capabilities, including potentially better video recording features. We can assume both will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the Ace 3 Pro is more likely to have a dedicated telephoto lens.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant leap over the Oppo A6 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 cores and 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, offering substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Dimensity 7300’s 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration is capable, but will struggle to match the Snapdragon’s sustained performance in demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 GPU also provides a considerable advantage in graphics-intensive applications. Both utilize a 4nm process, but Qualcomm’s architecture and manufacturing process generally lead to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s 100W wired charging is significantly faster than the Oppo A6 Pro’s 80W charging. The Ace 3 Pro claims a 52% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes. While the A6 Pro supports multiple charging standards (PPS, PD, QC, UFCS), it won’t match the Ace 3 Pro’s speed. Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the faster charging of the Ace 3 Pro mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The A6 Pro’s 10W reverse wired charging is a useful feature for topping up accessories, but the Ace 3 Pro’s charging speed is the primary advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 Pro (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with fast charging and don't require the absolute highest performance for gaming. It's a smart choice for users who prioritize battery life and value. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, or intensive multitasking, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and its associated benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 7300 in the Oppo A6 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 7300 is a capable chip, Genshin Impact and similar graphically intensive games will likely require reduced graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate on the Oppo A6 Pro. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Ace 3 Pro will handle these games at higher settings with less performance compromise.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro compared to the 80W on the Oppo A6 Pro in real-world use?
The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s 100W charging will provide a noticeable difference in charging speed. It can reach 100% in approximately 36 minutes, while the Oppo A6 Pro will take longer, likely closer to 45-60 minutes. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is known for its performance, but it can generate heat under sustained load. OnePlus typically implements effective thermal management solutions, but some throttling may occur during extended gaming. However, the Ace 3 Pro’s cooling system is likely more robust than the A6 Pro’s, mitigating this issue.
