The Oppo A6 GT and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Oppo A6 GT emerges as the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power over the Redmi Note 11 Pro+'s Snapdragon 695, translating to smoother multitasking and improved gaming. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ charges slightly faster to 50%, the A6 GT's overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 09 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 198 g or 204 g (6.98 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, 50% in 24 min
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Blue, Silver/Pink | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | PLL110 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A6 GT
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Faster overall charging speed (80W)
- Wider charging protocol support (PPS, PD, QC)
- Camera specifications currently unknown
- Potential for higher price point
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster initial charging to 50%
- Potentially lower price
- Established camera system (108MP main sensor)
- Older and less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Less efficient 6nm process
- Limited CPU core configuration
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 11 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a 120Hz AMOLED panel, common for its price bracket. The Oppo A6 GT, being newer, may incorporate advancements in color calibration or peak brightness. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume both offer acceptable viewing experiences, but the A6 GT *could* benefit from newer panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is known for its 108MP main sensor, a feature likely carried over. The Oppo A6 GT’s camera specifications are currently unknown, but its newer chipset *could* offer improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A6 GT would be a crucial factor, as it significantly improves image stability.
Performance
The core differentiator lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A6 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 7 Gen 3 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU architecture also favors the A6 GT; its Cortex-A715 cores are more performant than the Kryo 660 Gold cores in the 695. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The A6 GT's CPU configuration (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) provides a more balanced and powerful core arrangement.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) advertises a 0-50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes with its 67W charging. The Oppo A6 GT boasts 80W wired charging, with 50% achieved in 24 minutes. While the Redmi initially charges slightly faster, the A6 GT’s 80W offers a more substantial overall charging speed. The A6 GT also supports 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, and 13.5W QC, offering broader compatibility with various chargers, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ supports PD3.0 and QC3. Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but the faster charging of the A6 GT mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 GT if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value a more modern chipset for long-term software support. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize a slightly faster initial charging speed and are on a tighter budget, accepting a compromise in processing performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Oppo A6 GT handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't match the performance of flagship processors, it should comfortably run Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) really charge to 100% in 42 minutes in real-world usage?
Advertised charging times are often achieved under ideal conditions. In real-world usage, factors like battery temperature and background processes can increase charging time. Expect the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ to take closer to 45-50 minutes to fully charge from 0%.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and Snapdragon 695 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference may not be immediately apparent. However, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides a smoother and more responsive experience when multitasking, switching between apps, and handling more complex web pages. The extra processing power ensures the phone remains fluid even with numerous apps running in the background.
