The Oppo A6 GT and Xiaomi Poco F4 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F4, leveraging the older but still potent Snapdragon 870, has established itself as a performance-per-dollar champion. The A6 GT, however, brings a newer chipset – the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 – and faster charging to the table. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 remains the stronger choice. While the Oppo A6 GT offers faster charging and a newer chipset, the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 delivers demonstrably better overall performance, particularly in sustained workloads, making it ideal for gamers and power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 09 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.30 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g or 204 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, 50% in 24 min
10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Blue, Silver/Pink | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | PLL110 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 220 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A6 GT
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Newer Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Lower overall performance compared to Snapdragon 870
- Limited display specifications available
Xiaomi Poco F4
- More powerful Snapdragon 870 processor
- High peak display brightness (1003 nits)
- Proven performance in gaming and demanding tasks
- Slower 67W charging
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a display capable of reaching 1003 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the A6 GT’s display specifications are not provided, the Poco F4’s high brightness is a significant advantage. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels. The absence of refresh rate data for the A6 GT makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Poco F4’s brightness is a clear win for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for the A6 GT, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Poco F4 likely benefits from Xiaomi’s established image processing algorithms. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it impossible to assess low-light performance differences. We can assume both phones will offer acceptable image quality, but the Poco F4’s established reputation suggests a slight edge.
Performance
This is where the core difference lies. The Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) features a Kryo 585 CPU clocked up to 3.2 GHz, offering a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo A6 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm). While the 7 Gen 3 benefits from a more efficient 4nm process, the 870’s larger core count and higher clock speeds translate to superior performance in benchmarks and real-world applications. The Snapdragon 870’s Adreno 660 GPU also outperforms the A6 GT’s GPU, making the Poco F4 the better choice for mobile gaming. The 4nm process of the A6 GT will likely result in better thermal efficiency, but it doesn't overcome the raw power deficit.
Battery Life
Both the Poco F4 and A6 GT have an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the A6 GT). However, charging speeds are a key differentiator. The A6 GT’s 80W wired charging, supporting 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, and 13.5W QC, is significantly faster than the Poco F4’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3. The A6 GT can reach 50% charge in just 24 minutes, while the Poco F4 takes 38 minutes for a full charge. The A6 GT also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Poco F4.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 GT if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a modern chipset, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power. This phone is best for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day and appreciate the latest technology. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you value consistent performance, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to trade slightly slower charging for a more powerful processor and a proven track record.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Oppo A6 GT offer a noticeable gaming improvement over previous Snapdragon 7 series chips?
While the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is an improvement over its predecessors, it doesn't match the raw gaming power of the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4. The 870's larger L3 cache and higher clock speeds provide a more consistent and smoother gaming experience, especially in graphically demanding titles.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Oppo A6 GT compare to other fast charging solutions in terms of heat generation?
80W charging is fast, but Oppo incorporates technologies to mitigate heat generation. While it will get warmer than slower charging methods, the A6 GT's charging system is designed to manage temperatures effectively. However, prolonged use of extremely fast charging can still contribute to long-term battery degradation.
❓ Is the Poco F4 still a good buy in 2024, considering its older chipset?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 870 remains a very capable chipset, and the Poco F4's performance holds up exceptionally well even in 2024. It offers a fantastic balance of power and price, making it a compelling option for users who prioritize performance over having the absolute latest hardware.
❓ What type of user would benefit most from the reverse wired charging feature on the Oppo A6 GT?
The reverse wired charging feature is most useful for users who frequently carry accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches. It allows you to top up these devices using the A6 GT's battery as a power source, eliminating the need for separate chargers.
