The Oppo A6 GT and vivo V25 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The A6 GT brings a newer chipset with a focus on efficiency, while the V25 Pro boasts a proven track record and a focus on camera capabilities. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A6 GT emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a noticeable performance and efficiency advantage over the vivo V25 Pro’s 6nm Dimensity 1300. Coupled with faster 80W charging, the A6 GT provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 09 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.30 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g or 204 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color
Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, 50% in 24 min
10W reverse wired | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Blue, Silver/Pink | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | PLL110 | V2158 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 704090 (v9)
GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A6 GT
- More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Faster 80W charging with multiple standards
- Potentially better thermal management
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details are limited
vivo V25 Pro
- Known 805 nits peak display brightness
- Proven performance with Dimensity 1300
- Established software experience
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 1300
- Slower overall charging speed
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 Pro’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 805 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. However, the Oppo A6 GT’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for OLED panels. Without knowing the A6 GT’s panel technology (LTPO vs standard OLED) or refresh rate, it’s hard to definitively declare a winner, but the V25 Pro’s brightness is a known quantity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The focus should be on image processing and real-world performance, which are difficult to assess without sample photos. The absence of specific sensor details makes a direct comparison challenging. We can assume both phones offer standard photo and video modes, but the A6 GT’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 may offer improved noise reduction and dynamic range. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lenses on both devices, the main sensor quality will be the deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A6 GT utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), while the vivo V25 Pro features the MediaTek Dimensity 1300 (6nm). The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides a significant advantage in thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 – is optimized for a balance of performance and power. The Dimensity 1300’s CPU – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – while powerful, is less efficient. This translates to potentially longer gaming sessions and smoother multitasking on the A6 GT.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Oppo A6 GT supports 80W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 24 minutes, alongside 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, and 13.5W QC standards. The vivo V25 Pro’s 66W charging takes 15 minutes to reach 40% and 30 minutes for 71%. While the V25 Pro’s initial charge is quicker, the A6 GT’s 80W system ultimately provides a faster full charge and supports a wider range of charging protocols, including reverse wired charging at 10W.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 GT if you prioritize gaming performance, efficient power usage, and rapid charging. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask, play demanding games, or simply want a phone that keeps up with a fast-paced lifestyle. Buy the vivo V25 Pro if you value a phone with a proven track record, a potentially more refined software experience (depending on personal preference for ColorOS vs. Funtouch OS), and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the Oppo A6 GT offer a significant gaming improvement over the Dimensity 1300 in the vivo V25 Pro?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s newer architecture and 4nm process provide a noticeable advantage in sustained gaming performance. It’s less prone to thermal throttling, allowing for higher frame rates and smoother gameplay over extended periods, especially in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Genshin Impact.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the Oppo A6 GT compare to the 66W charging on the vivo V25 Pro in real-world usage?
While the V25 Pro charges faster initially (40% in 15 minutes), the A6 GT’s 80W charging ultimately delivers a quicker full charge. The A6 GT also supports a wider range of charging protocols (PPS, PD, QC), offering greater compatibility with various chargers and accessories.
❓ Is the difference in chipset efficiency between the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and Dimensity 1300 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 4nm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is more power-efficient. This translates to slightly longer battery life during typical usage, such as browsing, social media, and video streaming. You'll also experience less heat buildup during prolonged tasks.
