The Oppo A6 GT and Honor X9 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at accessible price points, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device offers the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A6 GT emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9 5G, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive gaming experience. While the Honor X9 5G offers respectable battery life, the A6 GT’s 80W charging significantly reduces downtime.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 09 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 09 | Available. Released 2022, March 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.6 x 7.7 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.30 in) | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g or 204 g (6.98 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 13.5W QC, 50% in 24 min
10W reverse wired | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Blue, Silver/Pink | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | PLL110 | ANY-NX1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 240 EUR |
Oppo A6 GT
- Significantly faster charging (80W)
- More powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Improved thermal efficiency due to 4nm process
- Potentially higher price point
- No information on display quality
Honor X9 5G
- Potentially lower price
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Reliable Snapdragon 695 for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (66W)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Honor provide display specs beyond the basic information. Assuming typical IPS LCD panels for this price bracket, the display experience will likely be similar in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles. However, the real difference lies elsewhere. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing capabilities. The more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 of the Oppo A6 GT will likely result in better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Honor X9 5G will likely rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for its less capable ISP. It's safe to assume both phones will feature a primary camera and depth/macro sensors, but the A6 GT’s processing power gives it an edge.
Performance
The core differentiator between these two phones is the chipset. The Oppo A6 GT’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Honor X9 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 7 Gen 3 translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. The CPU architecture also favors the Oppo, with a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core and three additional A715 cores, compared to the Honor’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This means the A6 GT will handle demanding tasks and games with greater ease and less throttling. The Honor X9 5G’s Snapdragon 695 is sufficient for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or heavy multitasking.
Battery Life
The Oppo A6 GT boasts an 80W wired charging capability, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 24 minutes, and supports multiple charging protocols (PPS, PD, QC). This is a substantial advantage over the Honor X9 5G’s 66W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 81%. While the Honor X9 5G may have a slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the A6 GT’s faster charging mitigates any potential endurance differences, offering significantly less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A6 GT if you prioritize performance for gaming, demanding apps, and future-proofing. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers a noticeable advantage for users who frequently multitask or enjoy mobile gaming. Buy the Honor X9 5G if you prioritize a slightly more conservative budget and are primarily focused on essential smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Its Snapdragon 695 is adequate for these scenarios, and the slightly larger battery may offer marginally longer endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9 5G struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not designed for high-end gaming. While you might be able to run these games at lower settings, expect noticeable frame drops and potential overheating. The Oppo A6 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is far better equipped to handle these titles with smoother performance.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Oppo A6 GT compared to the 66W charging on the Honor X9 5G in real-world use?
The Oppo A6 GT can reach 50% charge in 24 minutes, while the Honor X9 5G takes 30 minutes for 81%. This translates to roughly 6 minutes faster for the Oppo to reach the halfway point, and a significantly quicker full charge overall. This is a substantial difference for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Oppo A6 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offer noticeable improvements in multitasking compared to the Honor X9 5G?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s more powerful CPU and improved memory management will result in smoother app switching and a more responsive experience when running multiple applications simultaneously. The Honor X9 5G may exhibit lag or slowdowns when multitasking with demanding apps.
