The Oppo A5x and Samsung Galaxy A22 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware and resulting user experience. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A5x emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Galaxy A22’s Helio G80, and the 45W charging is a game-changer in this price bracket. While battery endurance is similar, the A5x’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 23 | 2021, June 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 25 | Available. Released 2021, July 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 600 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 37 min | 15W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Tranquil Lake Green, Laser White | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Models | - | SM-A225F, SM-A225F/DS, SM-A225M, SM-A225M/DS |
| Price | ₹ 11,499 | € 193.97 / £ 160.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.6 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 185358 (v8), 165959 (v9)
GeekBench: 5464 (v4.4), 1372 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A5x
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better image processing due to stronger ISP
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Brand recognition may be lower than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A22
- Bright 597 nit display
- Established brand reputation
- Good battery endurance (121 hours)
- Slower 15W charging
- Less powerful Mediatek Helio G80 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A22 boasts a measured peak brightness of 597 nits, which is respectable for outdoor visibility. However, the Oppo A5x’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Given Samsung’s history, the A22 likely has an infinite contrast ratio due to its AMOLED panel, offering deeper blacks. Without knowing the A5x’s panel type, it’s hard to assess color accuracy, but the A22’s AMOLED panel generally provides more vibrant colors. The A22’s display is a known quantity, while the A5x’s remains a variable.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a definitive comparison is challenging. However, the A5x’s more powerful chipset suggests it may have better image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to improved image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value. The A22’s camera is a known quantity, but the A5x’s potential remains largely unknown.
Performance
The Oppo A5x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) represents a significant leap forward compared to the Samsung Galaxy A22’s Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm). The Dimensity 6300’s newer architecture, featuring 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, delivers superior CPU performance compared to the A22’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 6nm process node also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling. This means the A5x will handle demanding tasks and sustained gaming sessions more effectively. The A22’s Helio G80 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with more intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A5x and Samsung Galaxy A22 share an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the A5x’s charging capabilities are dramatically superior, offering 45W wired charging with support for 33W PPS and 13.5W PD. This allows the A5x to reach 50% charge in just 37 minutes. In contrast, the Galaxy A22 is limited to 15W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. While both phones last roughly the same on a single charge, the A5x’s faster charging provides greater convenience and reduces downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5x if you prioritize performance for multitasking, streaming, and light gaming, and if rapid charging is a must-have feature. You'll benefit from a smoother, more responsive experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A22 if you value a proven brand reputation and a potentially wider availability of accessories, and if your usage is primarily focused on basic communication and light social media, where the performance difference will be less noticeable.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G80 in the Galaxy A22 struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
The Helio G80 is capable of running PUBG, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The A5x’s Dimensity 6300 offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and less frame rate fluctuation.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Oppo A5x compared to the 15W charging on the Galaxy A22 in real-world use?
The Oppo A5x can reach 50% charge in approximately 37 minutes, while the Galaxy A22 will take significantly longer – likely over 1.5 to 2 hours to reach the same level. This difference is substantial and makes the A5x ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Oppo A5x support any form of fast charging protocols beyond 45W?
Yes, the Oppo A5x supports 33W PPS and 13.5W PD, offering compatibility with a wider range of chargers and devices. This versatility is a bonus for users who already own PD-compatible chargers.
