The Oppo A5x 4G and Nokia 7.2 represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Nokia 7.2, released earlier, focuses on a refined design and display experience, while the Oppo A5x 4G prioritizes modern internals and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Oppo A5x 4G is the stronger choice. Its newer Snapdragon 6s Gen1 chipset provides a performance edge, and the incredibly fast 45W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Nokia 7.2 has a brighter display, the A5x’s overall package offers better value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, AGC DT-Star D+, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 36 min | 10W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Laser White | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | CPH2725 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | £ 89.00 / € 89.99 / ₹ 8,998 | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 64:03h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5x 4G
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- Newer, more efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen1 chipset
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating (64:03h vs 69h)
- Display brightness not specified
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display (585 nits)
- Established brand reputation
- Good battery endurance (69h)
- Slow 10W charging
- Older Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Less efficient 14nm manufacturing process
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a brighter display, measured at 585 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the Oppo A5x 4G. The 1342:1 contrast ratio is identical on both devices, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. However, the A5x’s display technology is unknown; the 7.2’s panel, while bright, is a standard LCD. The Nokia 7.2’s brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility, but the A5x’s potential for a more efficient panel could offset this.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Nokia 7.2’s camera system likely benefits from Nokia’s image processing algorithms, but the A5x’s newer ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 6s Gen1 could offer improved image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of detail makes it impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
The Oppo A5x 4G’s Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s Gen1 (11nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6s Gen1 utilizes a more efficient manufacturing process, and its octa-core configuration (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) offers a performance boost over the 660’s (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). While clock speeds aren’t everything, the newer architecture and smaller node size translate to better sustained performance and improved power efficiency for the A5x.
Battery Life
The Nokia 7.2 has an endurance rating of 69 hours, while the Oppo A5x 4G achieves 64:03 hours. This suggests comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the A5x’s charging capabilities are where it truly shines. With 45W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD support, it can reach 50% charge in just 36 minutes. The Nokia 7.2 is limited to a slow 10W wired charge, making the A5x far more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The A5x’s 1600 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5x 4G if you need a phone that can keep up with your daily tasks and charges incredibly quickly, minimizing interruptions. This is ideal for users who are constantly on the go. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prioritize a vibrant, bright display and prefer a more established brand with a focus on software simplicity, and aren't concerned about charging speed or the latest processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Oppo A5x 4G's charging compared to the Nokia 7.2?
The Oppo A5x 4G's 45W charging is dramatically faster than the Nokia 7.2's 10W charging. The A5x can reach 50% charge in just 36 minutes, while the Nokia 7.2 would take several hours to achieve the same level. This difference is crucial for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Will I notice a performance difference between the Snapdragon 6s Gen1 and Snapdragon 660 in everyday tasks?
Yes, you will likely notice a performance difference. The Snapdragon 6s Gen1, built on a more modern 11nm process, offers improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 660's 14nm architecture. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience.
❓ Does the Oppo A5x 4G support reverse wireless charging?
Based on available specifications, the Oppo A5x 4G does not appear to support reverse wireless charging. Its charging capabilities are focused on fast wired charging via USB-C.
❓ Is the Nokia 7.2 still a good option in 2024?
The Nokia 7.2 remains a viable option for users prioritizing a bright display and a clean software experience. However, its older chipset and slow charging are significant drawbacks compared to newer budget smartphones like the Oppo A5x 4G.
