Oppo A5x 4G vs. Motorola Moto G7 Power: A Battery Life and Performance Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Oppo A5x 4G emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly faster 45W charging, coupled with a more efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen1 chipset, offsets the Moto G7 Power’s initial endurance lead. The A5x 4G offers a more responsive experience and less downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A5x 4G | Motorola Moto G7 Power |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat7 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2019, February 07. Released 2019, February 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 159.4 x 76 x 9.3 mm (6.28 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, AGC DT-Star D+, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 (market dependent) |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 720 x 1570 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~279 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 94.0 cm2 (~77.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 506 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF | 12 MP, f2.0, 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass (market dependent) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 33W PPS, 13.5W PD, 50% in 36 min | 15W / 18W wired (market dependent) |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Laser White | Ceramic Black, Marine Blue, Iced Violet |
| Models | CPH2725 | XT1955, XT1955-4 |
| Price | £ 89.00 / € 89.99 / ₹ 8,998 | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -90.6dB / Crosstalk -89.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 147h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1674:1 (nominal), 3.176 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 75dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 107495 (v7) GeekBench: 4534 (v4.4) GFXBench: 7.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 64:03h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Oppo A5x 4G
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 6s Gen1 chipset
- Potentially longer battery lifespan (1600 cycles)
- Detailed display specs are unknown
- Camera specifications are not provided
Motorola Moto G7 Power
- Excellent battery endurance (147h)
- Good display contrast ratio for outdoor visibility
- Established reputation for reliability
- Slow 15W/18W charging
- Older, less efficient Snapdragon 632 chipset
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar display contrast ratio of 1674:1 (nominal) and 3.176 (sunlight), suggesting comparable outdoor visibility. However, the Oppo A5x 4G’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison of resolution and panel technology impossible. The Moto G7 Power’s display, while adequate, isn’t known for exceptional color accuracy or brightness, focusing instead on maximizing efficiency to conserve battery. The A5x 4G, with its more modern chipset, *could* support a higher refresh rate panel, though this isn’t confirmed.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a meaningful comparison is difficult. The presence of a camera is noted, but neither phone is likely to excel in photography. The Moto G7 Power’s camera is known to be adequate for basic snapshots, but struggles in low-light conditions. We can assume the A5x 4G offers similar capabilities, given the lack of differentiating specs.
Performance
The Oppo A5x 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen1 (11nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G7 Power’s Snapdragon 632 (14nm). The 6s Gen1 utilizes a combination of Cortex-A73 and A53 cores, offering a noticeable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the 632’s Kryo 250 Gold and Silver cores. The 11nm process node further enhances efficiency, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A5x 4G’s architecture is demonstrably more capable.
Battery Life
The Oppo A5x 4G boasts an impressive 64:03h endurance rating and supports a staggering 45W wired charging, 33W PPS, and 13.5W PD, achieving a 50% charge in just 36 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Motorola Moto G7 Power’s 147h endurance and slower 15W/18W charging. While the Moto G7 Power’s initial endurance is respectable, the A5x 4G’s faster charging mitigates the difference, allowing for quick top-ups and reducing downtime. The A5x 4G also claims 1600 battery cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5x 4G if you need rapid charging and a more modern processor for smoother multitasking and app performance. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up quickly throughout the day. Buy the Motorola Moto G7 Power if your absolute priority is maximizing battery life above all else, and you’re willing to trade off charging speed and processing power. It’s best suited for users who primarily make calls, text, and occasionally browse, and who can charge their phone overnight.