The Oppo A59 (2016) was a solid budget contender in its time, but the smartphone landscape has evolved. The Oppo F19s represents a more recent offering, boasting a newer chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine if the F19s justifies an upgrade for A59 users, or if the older model still holds value for basic smartphone needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Oppo F19s is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 662 chipset, built on an 11nm process, delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the A59’s older Mediatek MT6750. The 33W fast charging is a game-changer, addressing a common pain point in the budget segment.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 3, 7, 38, 39, 40, 41 - A59t | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2016, June. Released 2016, June | 2021, September 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 154.5 x 76 x 7.4 mm (6.08 x 2.99 x 0.29 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T860MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), ColorOS 3 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.2", 1.4µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3075 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Rose Gold | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2219, CPH2223 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 230 EUR |
Oppo A59 (2016)
- Extremely affordable
- Functional for basic tasks
- Simple and easy to use
- Outdated chipset
- Slow performance
- Slow charging
- Likely poor camera performance
Oppo F19s
- Faster and more efficient processor
- 33W fast charging
- Improved camera capabilities
- Better software support (potentially)
- Higher price than the A59
- May still lack advanced features found in higher-end phones
- Specific battery capacity unknown
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo provides detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given the A59’s 2016 release, it likely features an LCD panel with a standard 720p resolution. The F19s, being a newer device, likely benefits from improved color accuracy and potentially a higher resolution, though specifics are unknown. The difference in manufacturing processes between the two eras suggests the F19s will have better viewing angles and potentially higher peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the F19s, as a newer device, likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. The A59’s camera, typical of its era, likely struggles in low-light conditions. While both phones may include multiple rear cameras, the F19s’ image processing capabilities will likely deliver more detailed and vibrant photos, even with similar sensor sizes. It's reasonable to assume the F19s offers better dynamic range and noise reduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F19s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is a substantial leap forward from the A59’s Mediatek MT6750 (28nm). The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 662 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation. The CPU architecture also favors the F19s; its Kryo 260 Gold & Silver cores offer better sustained performance than the A59’s Cortex-A53 arrangement. While both are octa-core, the F19s’ cores operate at higher clock speeds (2.0 GHz vs 1.5 GHz), resulting in snappier responsiveness and smoother multitasking. The F19s will handle modern apps and games with considerably less lag.
Battery Life
The A59’s battery capacity is unknown, but the F19s’ standout feature is its 33W wired charging, capable of delivering a 54% charge in just 30 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the A59, which likely supports significantly slower charging speeds. While the F19s’ battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 662’s efficiency means it will likely offer comparable or better battery life than the A59, despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery size. The faster charging significantly reduces downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A59 (2016) if you need a functional, extremely affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and are unwilling to spend more than the absolute minimum. Buy the Oppo F19s if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, more responsive gaming, and significantly quicker charging – all for a still-reasonable price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo F19s run demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 662 in the F19s is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The A59’s Mediatek MT6750 would struggle significantly with these titles, likely resulting in noticeable lag and stuttering.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo F19s compatible with all USB-C chargers?
While the Oppo F19s uses USB-C, to achieve the full 33W charging speed, you’ll need a charger that supports the Oppo VOOC or SuperVOOC charging protocol, or a USB Power Delivery (USB-PD) charger capable of delivering sufficient wattage. Standard USB-C chargers will still work, but at a slower charging rate.
❓ How much of a performance difference can I realistically expect between the A59 and the F19s for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
You'll notice a significant improvement in responsiveness with the F19s. App loading times will be faster, multitasking will be smoother, and scrolling through social media feeds will be less laggy. The F19s’ more powerful processor and efficient architecture make everyday tasks feel much more fluid.
