The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A58x and Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid smartphone experience, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving it. The A58x focuses on efficiency with a Mediatek Dimensity 700, while the Poco X5 Pro prioritizes performance with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers significantly better performance, and the 67W fast charging is a game-changer compared to the Oppo A58x’s 10W charging. While the A58x offers a more efficient processor, the Poco X5 Pro’s overall package delivers a more responsive and convenient user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | IP54 | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A58x
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to Dimensity 700
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Simple and reliable software experience
- Significantly slower charging (10W)
- Less powerful processor for gaming and multitasking
- Display likely lacks brightness and contrast of the Poco X5 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Much faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially slightly lower battery life due to more powerful processor
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A58x
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be divisive
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to the Oppo A58x (brightness data unavailable, assumed lower based on chipset and price point). This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays likely feature similar resolutions for this price bracket, the Poco X5 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior panel capable of deeper blacks. The lack of information on the A58x’s panel technology makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X5 Pro’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 778G chipset will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The A58x’s camera system is likely geared towards basic photography, while the X5 Pro has the potential for more detailed and dynamic images. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and shouldn’t be a primary consideration.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A58x’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the A58x’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 700 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 778G offers a noticeable performance leap.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the differing chipsets. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, can fully charge the device in just 45 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Oppo A58x’s slow 10W wired charging. The X5 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A58x. While the A58x might offer slightly longer screen-on time due to the more efficient Dimensity 700, the convenience of the X5 Pro’s rapid charging is a significant benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58x if you prioritize long-term battery life and a consistently stable, if less powerful, experience for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. It’s ideal for users who rarely game or run demanding applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and faster charging. This phone is geared towards users who want a more responsive device and don’t mind sacrificing some potential battery efficiency for increased power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its relatively good thermal efficiency. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, the 6nm process node and Xiaomi’s cooling solutions typically prevent significant throttling. Expect playable frame rates even after 30-60 minutes of demanding games.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Oppo A58x realistically usable in 2024?
10W charging is significantly slower than modern standards. Expect a full charge to take well over 3 hours, making it inconvenient for users accustomed to fast charging. It’s best suited for overnight charging or topping up the battery when not in active use.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Oppo A58x and the Poco X5 Pro?
The Oppo A58x runs ColorOS, known for its clean interface and user-friendly features. The Poco X5 Pro runs MIUI, which is more feature-rich but can be more cluttered and include pre-installed apps (bloatware). MIUI also has a more aggressive battery management system that may impact background app performance.
❓ Will the Poco X5 Pro support future Android updates?
Xiaomi typically provides at least two major Android updates and three years of security patches for its devices. The Poco X5 Pro should receive Android 14 and Android 15, along with regular security updates for the foreseeable future.
