The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A58x and vivo Y55s (2023) are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y55s (2023) edges out the Oppo A58x thanks to its significantly faster 18W charging. While both share the same Dimensity 700 chipset, the Y55s's charging advantage makes it a more practical choice for everyday use, especially for those prioritizing quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, January 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2023, January 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Black, Blue |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo A58x
- Compact design (likely)
- Decent performance for the price
- Good battery life
- Slow 10W charging
- Potentially less refined camera processing
vivo Y55s (2023)
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially better camera processing (vivo tuning)
- Good battery life
- Slightly larger size (potentially)
- Performance similar to Oppo A58x
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.5-inch LCD displays with a 720 x 1600 resolution. Expect decent viewing angles and color accuracy for everyday use, but don't expect flagship-level display quality. The vivo Y55s might have a slightly brighter panel, but this is speculative without official data.
Camera Comparison
While both likely feature a 50MP main camera, vivo often employs more aggressive image processing, potentially resulting in more vibrant (though sometimes less accurate) colors. The Oppo A58x might offer a more natural image profile. Expect similar selfie camera performance, likely around 8-16MP.
Performance
Powered by the same Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, both phones offer comparable performance for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Don't expect to run demanding games at high settings, but both should handle casual gaming well. Software optimization could be a differentiating factor here.
Battery Life
Both phones likely pack a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the vivo Y55s (2023)'s 18W charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the Oppo A58x's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A58x is a good choice for users who prioritize a slightly more compact design and are less concerned about charging speed. The vivo Y55s (2023) is ideal for those who value faster charging and a potentially slightly improved camera experience (based on typical vivo camera tuning).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 700 chipset good for gaming?
The Dimensity 700 is suitable for casual gaming, but don't expect to play demanding titles at high settings. It's more than adequate for everyday use and light gaming.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones likely offer similar battery life due to their 5000mAh batteries. However, the vivo Y55s (2023) charges significantly faster.
