The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A58x and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an accessible price point, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G emerges as the winner thanks to its faster charging, potentially better camera capabilities, and the overall polish of the Samsung ecosystem. While the Oppo A58x is a decent option, the A23 5G offers a more well-rounded experience for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A58x
- Potentially more affordable
- Compact design (likely)
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging (10W)
- Likely less powerful chipset
- Potentially inferior camera
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Faster charging (25W)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Potentially better camera system
- Samsung's software and ecosystem
- Potentially slightly larger size
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G boasts a brighter display (508 nits vs. likely lower on the A58x) and a similar contrast ratio (1328:1). While both likely use LCD panels, the A23 5G's higher brightness provides better visibility in outdoor conditions. The A58x might have a slightly smaller form factor, which some users may prefer.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are missing for the A58x, the Galaxy A23 5G is expected to have a more versatile camera system, likely including a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. Samsung's camera software is also generally well-regarded. The A58x may offer decent image quality, but likely won't match the A23 5G's capabilities.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Galaxy A23 5G generally outperforms the Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A58x in real-world usage. The Kryo 660 cores offer a noticeable speed boost for multitasking and demanding apps. Both phones handle everyday tasks well, but the A23 5G provides a smoother experience overall.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 138 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Galaxy A23 5G's 25W charging is significantly faster than the Oppo A58x's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A58x? Users prioritizing a slightly more compact design and potentially a more affordable price tag. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G? Those seeking faster charging, a potentially superior camera system, and the reliability of the Samsung brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better 5G connectivity?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is specifically designed for 5G networks and likely offers better 5G performance and broader band support.
❓ Is the Oppo A58x worth considering if I'm on a very tight budget?
Yes, the Oppo A58x can be a viable option if you're looking for the absolute lowest price. However, be aware of the compromises in charging speed and performance compared to the Galaxy A23 5G.
