Oppo offers a range of smartphones catering to different budgets and needs. The Oppo A58x sits in the more affordable segment, while the Reno8 aims for a premium experience. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 is the clear winner, offering significantly faster performance, a superior camera, blazing-fast charging, and a brighter display. While the A58x is a budget-friendly option, the Reno8's upgrades justify its higher price for most users seeking a more complete smartphone experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | - | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 105h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 619610a (v9)
GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A58x
- Affordable
- Long battery life
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slow charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower quality display
- Basic camera
Oppo Reno8
- Fast charging (80W)
- Powerful chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Brighter and better display
- Superior camera
- Premium design
- More expensive
- Battery life, while good, isn't dramatically better than A58x
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 boasts a significantly brighter display at 633 nits (measured) compared to the A58x, offering better visibility outdoors. The Reno8's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors, though this is a marketing term. The A58x likely has a standard, adequate display for everyday use, but lacks the vibrancy of the Reno8.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Reno8 is expected to have a superior camera system due to its more advanced chipset and likely better sensors. Expect improved image quality, better low-light performance, and potentially more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) on the Reno8. The A58x's camera is likely sufficient for casual snapshots.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the A58x's Dimensity 700. The Dimensity 1300 features a more powerful CPU core (Cortex-A78) and a more efficient architecture, resulting in noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The A58x is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones claim an endurance rating of 105h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Reno8's 80W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a 50% charge in just 11 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes. The A58x's 10W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A58x? Users on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8? Users who want a faster phone, better camera, faster charging, and a more premium design, and are willing to spend more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 worth the extra money?
Yes, if you value performance, camera quality, and fast charging. The Reno8 offers a significantly better overall experience.
❓ What is the battery life like on the Oppo A58x?
The Oppo A58x offers excellent battery life, easily lasting a full day or more with moderate usage.