Oppo's budget phone lineup is constantly evolving, offering compelling options for those seeking value. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Oppo A58x and the Oppo F23. Both promise a solid experience, but which one truly delivers the best bang for your buck?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F23 is the clear winner. While the A58x is a decent budget option, the F23's significantly faster charging (67W vs 10W), more modern chipset, and likely improved camera capabilities make it a superior choice for most users, despite potentially a slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, May 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2023, May 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Cool Black, Bold Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2527 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A58x
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Reliable brand
- Slow charging
- Older chipset
- Potentially weaker camera
Oppo F23
- Fast charging (67W)
- Modern chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Likely better camera
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially slightly more expensive
- May lack some of the A58x's niche features
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely LCD) and resolution, though the F23 might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to its newer chipset. Expect a standard 6.5-6.7 inch display on both.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, the F23 is expected to have a more capable camera system. The Snapdragon 695 often pairs with better image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better image quality, especially in low light. Expect a main camera around 50MP on both, but the F23's image processing will likely be superior.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Oppo F23 holds a significant advantage over the Dimensity 700 in the A58x. The Snapdragon offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh). However, the F23's 67W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in under 40 minutes, while the A58x's 10W charging is painfully slow.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A58x? Those on the absolute tightest budget who prioritize basic functionality and don't need fast charging or high performance. Who should buy the Oppo F23? Anyone looking for a well-rounded budget phone with a good balance of performance, camera quality, and incredibly fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A58x worth buying in 2024?
It's a budget option, but the slow charging and older chipset make it less appealing compared to alternatives like the Oppo F23.
❓ How much faster is the Oppo F23's charging?
The F23 charges at 67W, while the A58x charges at 10W. This means the F23 can charge from 0% to 50% in approximately 18 minutes, while the A58x would take significantly longer.
