The Oppo A series consistently delivers affordable smartphones packed with features. But with multiple models available, choosing the right one can be tricky. We're pitting the Oppo A58x against the Oppo A1 to see which offers the best value and performance for budget-conscious buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A1 is the clear winner. Its significantly faster charging (67W vs 10W), more efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G), and likely improved camera performance make it a superior choice despite potentially a slightly higher price. The A58x is a decent option if charging speed isn't a priority.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2023, April 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 191 g or 193 g (6.74 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD, 76% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | - | PHS110 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 270 EUR |
Oppo A58x
- Potentially lower price
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slow 10W charging
- Older chipset
- Likely inferior camera
- Less efficient processor
Oppo A1
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Potentially better camera
- More efficient processor
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
While specific display details are missing for both, we can assume both phones feature LCD panels with Full HD+ resolution. The A1's newer chipset might allow for slightly better color accuracy and brightness, but this is speculative without concrete data. Screen size is likely similar, around 6.5-6.7 inches.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not fully available. However, the Snapdragon 695 5G generally supports more advanced camera features and image processing capabilities than the Dimensity 700. Expect the A1 to potentially deliver better image quality, especially in low-light conditions, and potentially offer features like improved stabilization and more advanced shooting modes.
Performance
The Oppo A1's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the A58x's Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming experiences. The A58x will be adequate for basic tasks, but the A1 provides a noticeably more responsive feel.
Battery Life
The Oppo A1's 67W fast charging is a game-changer. It can charge the battery to 76% in just 30 minutes, a stark contrast to the A58x's slow 10W charging. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), but the A1's charging speed makes a significant difference in usability.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A58x? Users prioritizing a slightly lower price point and aren't concerned about fast charging. Who should buy the Oppo A1? Anyone seeking a faster, more modern chipset, significantly quicker charging, and potentially better camera capabilities within a similar budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A58x worth buying if I'm on a very tight budget?
The A58x can be a viable option if price is the absolute primary concern and you don't need fast charging or high performance. However, the A1 often offers better value overall.
❓ What is the difference between the Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 695 5G?
The Snapdragon 695 5G is generally considered a more powerful and efficient chipset, offering better CPU and GPU performance compared to the Dimensity 700. It also supports more advanced features and technologies.
