Oppo A58x vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W SuperVOOC charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a slight edge in sustained performance and power efficiency compared to the A58x’s Dimensity 700.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A58x | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP54 | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | - | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A58x
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Likely a larger battery capacity (speculation)
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less efficient 7nm chipset
- Older CPU architecture
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- 67W SuperVOOC fast charging
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Modern CPU architecture (Kryo 660)
- Potentially higher price
- May have a slightly smaller battery capacity (speculation)
- Camera performance dependent on sensor quality (unspecified)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on functionality rather than visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be moderate on both, prioritizing affordability over an immersive edge-to-edge experience. The absence of high refresh rates (90Hz or 120Hz) is also typical for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will prioritize a main camera for general photography. The A58x and Nord CE 3 Lite likely include auxiliary lenses (depth, macro) for versatility, but their image quality will be limited. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Nord CE 3 Lite may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions, due to its more advanced architecture. The aperture of the main lens will be a key factor, but without that data, it's difficult to assess.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process than the Oppo A58x’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). This translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. While both CPUs feature a similar octa-core configuration with 2x high-performance cores and 6x efficiency cores, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more advanced than the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores. This means the Nord CE 3 Lite will likely handle demanding apps and games with slightly less throttling. The A58x will be adequate for everyday tasks, but may struggle with graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. The ability to reach 80% charge in just 30 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the Oppo A58x’s slow 10W charging. While the A58x may have a slightly larger battery capacity (speculation based on typical market trends), the Nord CE 3 Lite’s rapid charging effectively mitigates any capacity disadvantage. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the Nord CE 3 Lite’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58x if you prioritize a consistently lower price and are willing to accept slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks and light usage. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value fast charging, slightly better performance for gaming and multitasking, and a more modern chipset architecture. It’s ideal for users who need their phone to keep up with a busy lifestyle.