Both the Oppo A58 and the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G target the competitive budget 5G smartphone market. However, they approach this segment with different strategies. The Oppo A58 prioritizes affordability and a reliable experience, while the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G aims to deliver a more powerful processor and potentially a more premium feel, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset provides a substantial upgrade over the Oppo A58’s Dimensity 700, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming. However, the A58 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who prioritize basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.7 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, HIOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Models | - | CK8nB |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo A58
- More affordable price point
- Reliable and dependable performance for basic tasks
- Likely lighter and more compact design
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Potentially lower-quality display
- Limited future-proofing
Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G
- Much faster processor for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially superior display quality
- Better long-term performance and software support
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May experience more heat under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the A58's positioning, it likely features a standard 60Hz LCD panel. The Camon 20s Pro 5G, aiming for a slightly higher tier, may incorporate a higher refresh rate AMOLED display, offering richer colors and smoother scrolling. The absence of details like peak brightness or resolution makes a definitive statement impossible, but the Tecno has a higher potential for a superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G, positioned as a more feature-rich device, likely benefits from a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely include standard wide and depth sensors, the Tecno may feature a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and improved dynamic range. Image processing algorithms also play a crucial role, and Tecno's software is likely tuned for more vibrant and detailed images.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020, fabricated on a 6nm process, represents a significant architectural leap over the Oppo A58’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 8020 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the A58’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – resulting in substantially faster single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to quicker app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 6nm node also contributes to improved power efficiency, potentially mitigating the increased power draw of the more powerful cores.
Battery Life
Both devices share a 33W wired charging capability, suggesting similar charging speeds – likely around 60-70 minutes for a full charge. The actual battery life will depend on the battery capacity (not provided) and the power efficiency of the respective chipsets. While the Dimensity 8020 is more powerful, its 6nm fabrication process may offset some of the increased power consumption, potentially leading to comparable real-world battery performance despite the performance difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58 if you need a dependable, affordable 5G phone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. You'll appreciate its simplicity and lower price point. Buy the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G if you prefer a more responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or anticipate needing more processing power for demanding applications. The investment in the Dimensity 8020 will pay off in long-term usability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8020 in the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 8020 is a capable chipset that should handle Genshin Impact and similar titles at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chips, it offers a significant improvement over the Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A58, providing a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the 33W charging on both phones fast enough for quick top-ups throughout the day?
33W charging is a respectable speed for this price range. While not the fastest available, it should provide a significant charge in a relatively short amount of time – approximately 30 minutes for a 50% charge. Both phones should offer similar charging times, assuming similar battery capacities.
❓ Does the Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G get noticeably warmer than the Oppo A58 during extended use?
The Tecno Camon 20s Pro 5G is likely to generate more heat under sustained load due to its more powerful processor. However, the 6nm fabrication process should help mitigate this. The Oppo A58, with its less demanding chipset, will likely remain cooler, but this comes at the cost of performance.
