Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The Oppo A58 and Samsung Galaxy A34 are both popular mid-range options, but they cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 emerges as the stronger contender, offering a brighter display, more powerful chipset, and generally better camera capabilities. While the Oppo A58 boasts faster charging, the A34's overall package provides a more premium and feature-rich experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IP54 | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | - | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A58
- Faster Charging (33W)
- More Affordable
- Simple User Interface
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Dimmer Display
- Less Versatile Camera
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter Display
- More Powerful Chipset
- Better Camera System
- Samsung Brand Reliability
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Slightly Higher Price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes a clear lead with its 1009 nits max brightness, making it significantly easier to view outdoors. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The Oppo A58's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the A34. Both use AMOLED panels, offering rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Galaxy A34 is expected to deliver superior image quality due to its more advanced chipset and likely better camera hardware (though specific specs are missing). Samsung's image processing is also generally regarded as more refined. The A58's camera is adequate for basic photography.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Oppo A58's Dimensity 700. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant performance boost over the A58's Cortex-A76 cores.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 133h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Oppo A58's 33W wired charging offers a faster charging experience compared to the A34's 25W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A58 is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing fast charging and a simple user experience. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking a vibrant display, smoother performance, a more versatile camera system, and the reliability of the Samsung brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have an endurance rating of 133h, indicating similar battery performance.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A34 worth the extra money?
Yes, if you prioritize a brighter display, faster performance, and a better camera. The Oppo A58 is a good budget option, but the A34 offers a more premium experience.
