The Oppo A58 and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G represent compelling options in the crowded sub-$200 smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieve it. The A58 prioritizes fast charging, while the A24 focuses on display quality, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G emerges as the slightly better choice. Its significantly brighter 1012 nit display offers a superior viewing experience, especially outdoors, and the more efficient Helio G99 chipset, despite similar CPU cores, provides a slight edge in sustained performance. The A58's faster charging is a benefit, but doesn't outweigh the A24's display advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, April 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IP54 | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Models | - | SM-A245F, SM-A245F/DS, SM-A245F/DSN, SM-A245M, SM-A245M/DS, SM-A245N |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A58
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less efficient chipset
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Significantly brighter 1012 nit display
- More power-efficient Mediatek Helio G99
- Strong battery endurance rating
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Samsung's One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts a substantial advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1012 nits. This is a significant leap over what we'd expect from the Oppo A58, making the A24 far more usable in direct sunlight. While both phones likely utilize LCD panels given their price point, the A24's higher brightness translates to better contrast and color vibrancy. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, and color accuracy will likely be typical for this segment – adequate, but not professional-grade.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. While both phones likely include multiple rear cameras, the 2MP macro lenses common in this price range offer limited practical value. The A24's image processing algorithms, typical of Samsung, tend to prioritize vibrant colors and boosted contrast, which may appeal to some users. The A58's image processing is likely more natural. Without detailed sensor size information, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the A24's brand reputation for camera software gives it a slight edge.
Performance
Both the Oppo A58 and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G are equipped with octa-core CPUs featuring the same core configuration: 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the underlying chipsets differ – the A58 uses the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) while the A24 employs the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). The 6nm process node of the Helio G99 offers improved power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. While raw CPU performance will be comparable, the G99's GPU is likely to provide a slightly smoother experience in graphically demanding applications. Both phones will likely be paired with 4GB or 6GB of RAM, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G has an endurance rating of 141 hours, indicating strong battery life. The Oppo A58's battery capacity is not specified, but its 33W wired charging is faster than the A24's 25W charging. This means the A58 can replenish its battery more quickly, a significant benefit for users who frequently need to top up. However, the A24's more efficient chipset may offset the charging speed difference, providing comparable real-world usage time despite a potentially smaller battery capacity. A full charge on the A58 is expected to take around 60-70 minutes, while the A24 will likely require closer to 80-90 minutes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58 if you prioritize rapid charging and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. It's ideal for users who are always on the go and can't afford downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G if you value a vibrant, easily visible display and appreciate a phone that can handle everyday tasks smoothly with a focus on media consumption and outdoor usability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G99's 6nm process and optimized thermal design generally prevent significant overheating during gaming. While some throttling is inevitable, it's less likely to be severe compared to less efficient chipsets. Expect playable frame rates in most popular titles, but demanding games at maximum settings may experience some performance dips over extended periods.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A58 significantly faster in real-world use than the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G?
Yes, the 33W charging on the A58 will noticeably reduce charging times. While the A24's battery efficiency is good, the A58 can gain a substantial percentage of charge in a shorter timeframe, making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the Oppo A58 and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G?
Samsung's image processing typically emphasizes vibrant colors and increased contrast, resulting in photos that are visually appealing but may not be entirely accurate. Oppo generally aims for a more natural look, preserving details and color accuracy. The preferred style is subjective and depends on individual preferences.
