Oppo A58 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite emerges as the better choice. Its 67W SuperVOOC charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a slight edge in sustained performance and thermal management. While the A58 is a capable device, the Nord CE 3 Lite’s faster charging and more modern chipset provide a more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A58 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP54 | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | - | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A58
- Potentially lower initial price
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Decent battery life for moderate usage
- Slower 33W charging
- Less efficient 7nm chipset compared to Snapdragon 695
- Likely less refined camera processing
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- 67W SuperVOOC fast charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potential for software bloat (OnePlus history)
- No significant display upgrades
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on premium features like high refresh rates or OLED technology. However, the absence of detailed display specs necessitates a reliance on brand reputation. OnePlus generally offers slightly better color calibration, while Oppo tends to prioritize brightness. The real-world difference will likely be minimal for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely employ a primary sensor paired with depth and macro lenses. The usefulness of the 2MP macro lens on both devices is questionable. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers superior image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction in the Nord CE 3 Lite’s photos. The A58’s camera performance will be acceptable, but the Nord CE 3 Lite is likely to deliver more consistently pleasing results, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process compared to the Oppo A58’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). This 6nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more advanced than the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores. This means the Nord CE 3 Lite will likely handle demanding apps and games with slightly less throttling. The A58 will be adequate for everyday tasks, but the Nord CE 3 Lite offers a more future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. The advertised 80% charge in 30 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the Oppo A58’s 33W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. Users who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up will greatly appreciate the Nord CE 3 Lite’s charging capabilities. The A58’s 33W charging is still respectable, but it simply can’t compete with the speed of SuperVOOC.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58 if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid all-rounder for basic smartphone tasks. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value fast charging, a more efficient processor for longer gaming sessions, and a generally smoother user experience. It’s the better option for users who are frequently on the go or enjoy mobile gaming.