The Oppo A58 and Motorola Moto G73 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The A58 focuses on a balance of features, while the Moto G73 prioritizes processing power with a more advanced chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G73 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 930 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo A58’s Dimensity 700. While the A58 offers a slightly faster 33W charging, the G73’s superior processing capabilities make it better suited for demanding tasks and future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, January 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | IP54 | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6833 Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Lucent White, Midnight Blue |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 190 EUR |
Oppo A58
- Slightly faster 33W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Less powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
- Older 7nm process may lead to more heat
- Potentially inferior camera performance
Motorola Moto G73
- More powerful Dimensity 930 chipset
- More efficient 6nm process
- Superior CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Advanced ISP for better camera performance
- Slightly slower 30W charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May require more careful thermal management under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Motorola provide detailed display specs beyond the basic panel type. However, the difference in chipsets suggests potential variations in display processing. The Moto G73’s Dimensity 930 has a more powerful ISP and display engine, potentially leading to more accurate color reproduction and smoother animations. While both likely feature LCD panels in this price bracket, the G73’s chipset could compensate for panel limitations with software enhancements. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar market positioning.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Dimensity 930 in the Moto G73 boasts a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) capable of handling higher resolution sensors and more complex image processing algorithms. This suggests the G73 will likely produce better quality photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The A58’s ISP, while adequate for basic photography, will be limited by the older chipset. It’s reasonable to assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the G73 will likely offer more refined results. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G73’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo A58’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance. Furthermore, the G73 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores in its CPU configuration, a more modern and efficient architecture than the A76 cores found in the A58. This means the G73 will exhibit faster single-core and multi-core performance, benefiting everything from app launch speeds to demanding games. While both phones share 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency, the G73’s overall processing power is substantially higher.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified, but both phones likely fall in the 5000mAh range, typical for this price point. The key difference is charging speed: the Oppo A58 supports 33W wired charging, while the Moto G73 is limited to 30W. This translates to a slightly faster 0-100% charge time for the A58, but the Dimensity 930’s superior power efficiency in the G73 could offset this difference in real-world usage, potentially resulting in comparable or even better battery life despite the slower charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58 if you prioritize a consistently affordable price and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Motorola Moto G73 if you value smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience, even if it means spending a little more upfront. The G73 is the better option for users who anticipate using their phone for more than just essential functions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G73 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 930 is a powerful chipset, the 6nm process helps mitigate heat generation. However, sustained gaming will inevitably produce heat. The Moto G73 likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but performance throttling is still possible during extended, demanding gameplay. It's unlikely to reach critical temperatures, but some performance reduction is expected.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Moto G73 significantly slower than the 33W on the Oppo A58?
The difference of 3W isn't massive. In practice, you'll likely see a 10-15 minute difference in a full charge. The Moto G73’s more efficient chipset may also reduce the overall time spent plugged in due to better battery life during typical use.
❓ Can the Motorola Moto G73 handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 930 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with smooth frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A58. Expect playable frame rates at HD graphics and high frame rate settings.
❓ Does the Oppo A58 have a noticeably better battery life than the Moto G73 due to its faster charging?
Not necessarily. While the A58 charges slightly faster, the Moto G73’s more efficient Dimensity 930 chipset could result in comparable or even better overall battery life. The A58 might reach 100% charge quicker, but the G73 could last longer on a single charge during typical usage.
