The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra aims to disrupt the mid-range market with flagship-level processing power and incredibly fast charging. Meanwhile, the Oppo A58 (China) represents a more conservative approach, focusing on affordability and essential features. This comparison dissects the core differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset provides significantly superior performance, and the 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the Oppo A58 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme budget-friendliness and don't require high-end performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, August 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, August 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Black, White, Green |
| Models | - | 23078RKD5C |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Oppo A58 (China)
- Highly affordable price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Acceptable 33W charging for everyday use
- Significantly less powerful than the Redmi K60 Ultra
- Likely utilizes a less advanced display panel
- Camera performance will be limited
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9200+
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Likely features a superior display and camera system
- Higher price compared to the Oppo A58
- May experience some heat during prolonged gaming sessions (though the 4nm process helps)
- Software bloatware is a potential concern with Xiaomi devices
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided for the Oppo A58, it's reasonable to expect a standard LCD panel given its price point. The Redmi K60 Ultra, however, benefits from a more advanced display technology, though specifics are missing. The key differentiator here is likely to be color accuracy and peak brightness. The Redmi K60 Ultra's potential for a higher refresh rate (likely 120Hz or 144Hz, based on market trends) would provide a smoother visual experience, particularly during gaming and scrolling, a feature the A58 likely lacks.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi K60 Ultra’s positioning, it’s likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Oppo A58 likely relies on a more basic camera setup. Image processing capabilities will also favor the K60 Ultra, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a dedicated image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 9200+ further enhances its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is a flagship-tier chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, designed for peak performance. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo A58’s Dimensity 700 (7nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9200+ offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700, meaning the K60 Ultra will sustain higher performance for longer periods without throttling. The K60 Ultra’s more modern CPU architecture (A715 vs A55) also contributes to faster application loading and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Redmi K60 Ultra’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, capable of fully charging the device in approximately 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Oppo A58’s 33W charging, which will take considerably longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the K60 Ultra effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The K60 Ultra also supports PD3.0, offering wider compatibility with chargers and accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58 (China) if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are comfortable with a less powerful processor. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and rapid charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a significantly enhanced user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 9200+ in the Redmi K60 Ultra prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, the 4nm manufacturing process and Xiaomi's thermal management solutions (likely including vapor chamber cooling) are designed to mitigate overheating. Some heat is expected during prolonged, demanding gaming, but it shouldn't lead to significant throttling or performance degradation.
❓ Does the Redmi K60 Ultra support high frame rate gaming, like 90fps or 120fps in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Redmi K60 Ultra's powerful GPU and high refresh rate display (likely 120Hz or 144Hz) make it well-suited for high frame rate gaming. While specific game support varies, it should be capable of achieving 90fps or higher in PUBG Mobile with optimized settings. Check game-specific settings for optimal performance.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A58 sufficient for daily use, or will I find myself frequently needing to top up the battery?
33W charging is adequate for overnight charging and topping up throughout the day, but it's considerably slower than the 120W charging on the Redmi K60 Ultra. If you're a heavy user or frequently find yourself running low on battery, you may need to charge the A58 more often.
