The OnePlus Ace 2V and Oppo A58 (China) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Ace 2V aims for near-flagship performance with its Dimensity 9000, while the A58 focuses on delivering a solid experience at a more accessible price point with the Dimensity 700. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9000 offers a substantial leap in processing power and its 80W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Oppo A58 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who don't require top-tier specs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 08 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 10 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Violet | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | - | PHP110 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Oppo A58 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Decent battery life for light usage
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Likely lower quality display
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 9000
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Likely superior display quality
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the Ace 2V, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a higher quality panel with potentially higher brightness and color accuracy. The A58, targeting a lower price bracket, will likely utilize a more cost-effective LCD or lower-tier AMOLED. Bezels are also expected to be slimmer on the Ace 2V, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for optimal battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make precise comparisons. However, the Ace 2V, being a higher-tier device, is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). A larger sensor captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The A58 likely relies on a smaller sensor and potentially lacks OIS. Image processing algorithms will also differ, with the Ace 2V likely offering more advanced features and better overall image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, delivers significantly higher performance than the Oppo A58’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Dimensity 9000’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.05 GHz) and A710 performance cores provide a substantial advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, while capable, are a generation behind and operate at a lower clock speed. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Ace 2V. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Ace 2V likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo A58’s 33W charging is respectable, but the OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W charging is a game-changer. The Ace 2V can reach 100% charge in just 32 minutes, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the Ace 2V effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Dimensity 9000’s improved power efficiency also contributes to better battery life, despite the higher performance demands.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A58 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and value affordability above all else. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you prioritize smooth multitasking, demanding mobile games, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, and are willing to spend more for a premium experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Ace 2V get noticeably hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9000 is a powerful chip, the 4nm fabrication process helps to manage thermal output. However, sustained gaming at high settings will inevitably generate heat. The Ace 2V likely incorporates thermal management solutions like vapor chamber cooling to mitigate throttling, but some performance reduction is still possible during extended play.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A58 slow compared to modern standards?
Yes, 33W charging is considerably slower than the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V. Expect a full charge to take well over an hour, whereas the Ace 2V can achieve 100% in around 32 minutes. This difference is significant for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
❓ Does the Oppo A58 support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Given its market segment in China, the Oppo A58 likely supports VoLTE and VoWiFi, but compatibility will depend on your carrier. It's crucial to verify carrier support before purchasing if these features are essential for you.
❓ How does the Dimensity 700 in the Oppo A58 handle multitasking with several apps open?
The Dimensity 700 can handle moderate multitasking, but it may exhibit slowdowns when running numerous demanding apps simultaneously. The 6GB of RAM (assumed based on market trends) is sufficient for typical usage, but it won't match the Ace 2V's likely 8GB or 12GB configuration.
