Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The Oppo A57s offers a budget-friendly option, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 is a mid-range powerhouse. This comparison will dissect both devices to help you determine which one best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the Oppo A57s provides decent value for its price, the A54's superior chipset, display, camera, and battery life make it a significantly better overall package, justifying its higher cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 31 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 12 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sky Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2385 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | - | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A57s
- Fast charging (33W)
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Weak chipset
- Mediocre display
- Basic camera
- Plastic build
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Powerful chipset (Exynos 1380)
- Excellent display
- Great camera
- Long battery life
- Premium design
- Slower charging (25W)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits vs. likely around 400-450 nits for the A57s) with an infinite contrast ratio, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The A57s display is adequate but lacks the premium feel and clarity of the A54.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is considerably more advanced, offering better image quality, more features, and improved video recording capabilities. While the A57s camera is functional, it lacks the detail and dynamic range of the A54.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the A54. The A57s is fine for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer good battery life, but the Galaxy A54's endurance rating (119h) suggests it will comfortably last a full day, even with heavy use. The Oppo A57s's 33W charging is faster, but the A54's larger battery capacity provides more overall usage time.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A57s? Users on a very tight budget who prioritize fast charging and basic functionality. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Anyone seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a great display, capable camera, and long-lasting battery, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A57s good for gaming?
The Oppo A57s can handle basic games, but its chipset struggles with more demanding titles. Expect lag and reduced graphics settings.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A54 have expandable storage?
No, the Samsung Galaxy A54 does not have a microSD card slot. You'll need to rely on the internal storage or cloud storage.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers longer software update support than Oppo. Expect more Android updates and security patches on the Galaxy A54.
❓ What is the build quality like on each phone?
The Galaxy A54 has a more premium feel with its glass back and aluminum frame, while the A57s uses a plastic build, which feels less premium.