Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The Oppo A57s and Samsung Galaxy A34 are both popular choices, but cater to different needs and budgets. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear winner, offering a significantly better chipset, display, and camera. While the Oppo A57s boasts faster charging, the A34's overall performance and features justify its slightly higher price point. It's a substantial upgrade.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 31 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 12 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starry Black, Sky Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | CPH2385 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | - | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A57s
- Faster charging (33W)
- More affordable
- Decent battery life
- Weaker chipset
- Less impressive display
- Lower camera quality
- Slower performance
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Superior chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Vibrant and bright display
- Better camera system
- Excellent battery life
- Premium design
- Slower charging (25W)
- Slightly higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34's display is a standout feature. Its 1009 nits max brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a stunning visual experience, far surpassing the Oppo A57s' likely less impressive panel. Colors are more vibrant, and visibility in sunlight is excellent. The A34's display is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the Galaxy A34 is expected to deliver superior image quality. Its likely better sensors and image processing algorithms will result in sharper, more detailed photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions. The A57s camera is adequate for basic use but lacks the advanced features and performance of the A34.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset (6nm) is a considerable upgrade over the Oppo A57s' Helio G35 (12nm). The Dimensity 1080 offers significantly faster processing speeds and better graphics performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, app loading, and gaming. The A57s will feel noticeably slower.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life with endurance ratings of 133h. However, the Oppo A57s' 33W wired charging is faster than the Galaxy A34's 25W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A57s is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging and basic smartphone functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded experience with a vibrant display, capable camera, and powerful performance for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A57s good for gaming?
The Oppo A57s can handle basic games, but its weaker chipset will struggle with more demanding titles. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a much better choice for gaming.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung is known for providing longer software update support than Oppo. The Galaxy A34 will likely receive more Android updates and security patches over its lifespan.
