The Oppo A57e and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on the impact of their respective chipsets and charging capabilities on real-world performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Oppo A57e’s Helio G35, making it better suited for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications. While the Oppo A57e boasts faster 33W charging, the Redmi Note 11R’s superior processing power offers a more impactful upgrade.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 31 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 31 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 600 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 30 min | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Green | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | CPH2387 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Oppo A57e
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially longer battery life due to simpler chipset
- Streamlined user experience (likely)
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Less capable for gaming and multitasking
- May struggle with demanding applications
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- Superior processor performance (Dimensity 700)
- Better for gaming and multitasking
- More efficient chipset
- Improved image processing capabilities
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the focus here is on internal processing power. Bezels are expected to be moderate on both, and color accuracy will likely be standard for the price range. The lack of high refresh rates is also typical.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, it’s reasonable to assume both devices feature a primary camera and supporting lenses. The Redmi Note 11R’s processing capabilities, stemming from the Dimensity 700, will likely result in better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Helio G35 in the Oppo A57e will struggle to deliver the same level of detail and dynamic range. The presence of a dedicated image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 700 further enhances its photographic capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, fabricated on a 7nm process, represents a significant leap over the Oppo A57e’s 12nm Mediatek Helio G35. The Dimensity 700’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the Helio G35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Redmi Note 11R deliver substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 7nm process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the Redmi Note 11R is less likely to throttle under sustained load. This benefits gamers and users who frequently engage in resource-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Oppo A57e’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage on paper, promising a 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging is considerably slower. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior efficiency may offset some of this difference in real-world usage. While the Oppo A57e will charge faster, the Redmi Note 11R may exhibit better overall battery life due to its more efficient chipset. Actual battery capacity is not provided, but the impact of the chipset on power consumption is significant.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A57e if you prioritize fast charging and a simple, streamlined user experience, and your primary use case revolves around basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you value performance for gaming, smoother multitasking, and a more capable device for running modern applications, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 chipset is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Oppo A57e’s Helio G35, which would likely struggle with consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Oppo A57e compared to the Redmi Note 11R in a typical use case?
The Oppo A57e’s 33W charging can add approximately 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour to reach the same level. This difference is most noticeable when you need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 provides snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience, even with everyday tasks. The Helio G35 in the Oppo A57e may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering.
