The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo A57e and Motorola Moto G52 represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The A57e emphasizes rapid charging, while the Moto G52 leverages Qualcomm's efficiency with the Snapdragon 680. This comparison dives deep into the specs to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G52 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a smoother and more consistent experience than the Oppo A57e’s Helio G35. While the A57e boasts faster 33W charging, the G52’s superior chipset and optimized power draw offer a more balanced package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 31 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 31 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 600 nits | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glowing Black, Glowing Green | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | CPH2387 | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 470 EUR |
Oppo A57e
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user interface
- Less efficient Helio G35 chipset
- Older CPU architecture
- Likely more thermal throttling under load
Motorola Moto G52
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Modern 6nm process
- Smoother overall performance
- Better long-term software support (likely)
- Slower 30W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Stock Android can be less feature-rich than Oppo's ColorOS
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The focus here is on the internals. The real difference lies beneath the surface, impacting the overall user experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a primary sensor paired with depth or macro lenses of limited utility. The aperture and sensor size of the main camera will be the key determinants of image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume Motorola’s image processing algorithms, honed over years of smartphone development, will likely deliver more consistent results than Oppo’s, but this is speculative without sample images.
Performance
The core differentiator is the chipset. The Motorola Moto G52’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo A57e’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to longer battery life and less thermal throttling. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 680 utilizes Kryo 265 Gold cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering a performance edge over the A57e’s 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This means smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience, especially when running multiple apps or moderately demanding games. The G35’s older architecture will struggle more with sustained loads.
Battery Life
The Oppo A57e’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 30 minutes. The Moto G52’s 30W charging is slower, but the Snapdragon 680’s superior efficiency means it will likely require less frequent charging overall. The actual battery capacity of both devices is not specified, but the G52’s chipset will extract more usage from a given mAh capacity, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A57e if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly. It’s a good fit for users who don’t heavily tax their phone with demanding apps or games. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you value consistent performance, better power efficiency for all-day use, and a more modern chipset architecture. This phone is ideal for users who stream videos, browse social media, and occasionally play casual games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57e struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio G35 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect some stuttering and potential overheating during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G52 will provide a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680 make in terms of battery life compared to the 12nm Helio G35?
The 6nm process is considerably more power-efficient. You can realistically expect the Moto G52 to last a full day with moderate usage, while the Oppo A57e might require a top-up before the end of the day, especially with heavier use. The Snapdragon 680 consumes less power for the same tasks, resulting in longer battery life.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G52 support software updates for longer than the Oppo A57e?
Generally, Motorola provides more consistent and longer-term software support than Oppo for devices in this price range. While neither guarantees multiple major Android updates, the Moto G52 is more likely to receive security patches and minor updates for a longer period.
