The Oppo A57 and Xiaomi Redmi 10C represent compelling options in the crowded sub-$200 smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The A57 leverages MediaTek’s Dimensity 810 chipset, while the Redmi 10C opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 680. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A57 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 810 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi 10C, making it better suited for multitasking and moderately demanding games. While the Redmi 10C counters with faster 18W charging, the A57’s brighter display and overall processing power give it the win.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 8.3 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Lilac | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green |
| Models | PFTM20 | 220333QAG, 220333QBI, 220333QNY, 220333QL |
| Price | About 200 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 109.86 |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A57
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- More efficient chipset potentially leading to better battery life during use
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Potentially less optimized software compared to Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
- Faster charging (18W)
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software offers extensive customization options
- Slower processor for demanding tasks
- Likely dimmer display
Display Comparison
The Oppo A57 boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 761 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and in brightly lit environments compared to the Redmi 10C, which lacks published brightness data but typically falls in the 400-500 nit range for its class. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the A57’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for users who consume a lot of media on the go. Bezels and resolution are likely comparable given the price bracket, but the A57’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, but the Redmi 10C often includes a 2MP macro lens which offers limited practical benefit. The image processing style will likely differ – Xiaomi often leans towards more saturated colors, while Oppo tends to aim for more natural tones. The aperture and sensor size of the main cameras will be key determinants of low-light performance, but this information is currently unavailable. We can assume both will deliver acceptable results in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A57’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Xiaomi Redmi 10C’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) which uses 4x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores and 4x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. While both are 6nm chips offering good efficiency, the A76 cores in the Dimensity 810 generally outperform the Kryo 265 Gold cores in CPU-intensive tasks. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the A57. The GPU performance will also favor the A57, making it the better choice for casual gaming.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi 10C has a clear advantage in charging speed with its 18W wired charging support, compared to the Oppo A57’s slower 10W charging. This means the Redmi 10C will reach a full charge significantly faster. However, the A57’s more efficient Dimensity 810 chipset may offset some of this advantage by consuming less power during typical usage. The actual battery capacity of both devices is not specified, but the faster charging of the Redmi 10C is a significant convenience factor for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A57 if you prioritize smooth performance for everyday tasks and occasional gaming, and value a brighter, more visible display. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between apps or enjoy mobile games. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10C if you prioritize longer battery life and faster charging speeds, and primarily use your phone for basic communication and light social media. It’s a solid choice for users who want a dependable device that won’t leave them scrambling for a charger.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 810 in the Oppo A57 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 810 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It’s not a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a playable experience for casual gamers. The Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi 10C will struggle more with higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 18W charging on the Redmi 10C compared to the 10W charging on the A57?
The Redmi 10C’s 18W charging will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity, expect the Redmi 10C to charge roughly 40-60% faster than the Oppo A57. This is a major convenience factor if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery.
❓ Does the Oppo A57 support any form of fast charging protocols beyond the standard 10W?
While the Oppo A57 advertises 10W charging, it may support some level of proprietary fast charging if used with a compatible Oppo charger. However, using a standard 10W charger is the recommended approach for optimal battery health and safety.
❓ Is the software experience significantly different between Oppo’s ColorOS and Xiaomi’s MIUI?
Yes, ColorOS and MIUI offer distinct software experiences. MIUI is known for its extensive customization options and features, while ColorOS generally prioritizes a cleaner, more streamlined interface. Both are based on Android, but the visual design and pre-installed apps differ considerably.
