The Oppo A57 and Realme C35 represent compelling options in the crowded sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. The A57 leverages the more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 810, while the C35 opts for the Unisoc Tiger T616. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on real-world performance implications and which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and a brighter display, the Oppo A57 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 810 chipset offers a noticeable advantage in processing power, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. However, the Realme C35’s faster 18W charging provides a convenience factor that may appeal to some.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 14 | 2022, February 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 15 | Available. Released 2022, February 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 8.1 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Lilac | Glowing Black, Glowing Green |
| Models | PFTM20 | RMX3511 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | £ 129.99 / ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A57
- More powerful Dimensity 810 chipset
- Brighter 761 nit display
- More efficient 6nm process node
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially higher price
Realme C35
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially lower price
- Unisoc’s image processing
- Less powerful Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset
- Likely dimmer display
Display Comparison
The Oppo A57 boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 761 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and in brightly lit environments compared to the Realme C35, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower given its chipset and market positioning. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the A57’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for everyday use. Bezels and resolution are likely comparable, focusing on cost optimization in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price points, both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors. The Realme C35 may lean on Unisoc’s image signal processing capabilities, while the Oppo A57 will utilize Mediatek’s. The real-world difference will likely be in image processing style – Oppo often favors more vibrant colors, while Realme tends towards a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A57’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Realme C35’s Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm) with its two Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 810 is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The A76 cores in the A57 also offer a performance uplift over the A75 cores in the C35. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user experience on the Oppo A57.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Realme C35’s 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Oppo A57’s 10W charging. This means significantly faster top-ups, reducing downtime. The Dimensity 810’s 6nm efficiency in the A57 may partially offset the slower charging, potentially offering comparable battery life in moderate usage scenarios. However, for power users, the C35’s faster charging will be more convenient.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A57 if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding apps, enjoy smoother multitasking, and value a brighter, more visible screen in outdoor conditions. Buy the Realme C35 if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are less concerned with peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Realme C35 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc Tiger T616 is an entry-level chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you’ll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering and reduced visual fidelity compared to devices with more powerful processors like the Dimensity 810 in the Oppo A57.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Realme C35 compared to the Oppo A57 in real-world usage?
The 18W charging on the Realme C35 will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times aren't available, expect the C35 to charge considerably faster – potentially shaving off an hour or more – compared to the Oppo A57’s 10W charging. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture between the Dimensity 810 and Tiger T616 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Dimensity 810’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a performance advantage over the Tiger T616’s Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, especially when switching between apps or running multiple applications simultaneously.
